Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30818091›Full record

ArticleHeart rhythm2019

Antiarrhythmic and proarrhythmic effects of subcutaneous nerve stimulation in ambulatory dogs.

Juyi Wan, Mu Chen, Yuan Yuan, Zhuo Wang, Changyu Shen, Michael C Fishbein, Zhenhui Chen, Johnson Wong, Maria B Grant, Thomas H Everett and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heart rhythm, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Autonomic Modulation of Atrial Fibrillation.JACC. Basic to translational science · 2023
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Neural Mechanisms and Therapeutic Opportunities for Atrial Fibrillation.Methodist DeBakey cardiovascular journal · 2021
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Juyi WanKrannert Institute of Cardiology and Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana; Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, Sichuan Province, China.
Mu ChenKrannert Institute of Cardiology and Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana; Department of Cardiology, Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Yuan YuanKrannert Institute of Cardiology and Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana; Department of Cardiac Surgery, Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Zhuo WangKrannert Institute of Cardiology and Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana; Department of Cardiology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Changyu ShenRichard and Susan Smith Center for Outcomes Research in Cardiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Michael C FishbeinDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California.
Zhenhui ChenKrannert Institute of Cardiology and Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana.
Johnson WongKrannert Institute of Cardiology and Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana.
Maria B GrantDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Alabama-Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama.
Thomas H EverettKrannert Institute of Cardiology and Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana.
Peng-Sheng ChenKrannert Institute of Cardiology and Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana. Electronic address: chenpp@iu.edu.
Indiana University School of MedicineShanghai Jiao Tong University · CNAffiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University · CNBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center · USIndiana University Hospital · USUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · US

Funding

SK Current, beta-3 adrenoceptor activation and Sex Differences in Ventricular ArrhythmogenesisR01HL139829 · NHLBI · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI PENG-SHENG CHEN, ZHILIN QU · 2018 to 2026
$4.5M
Skin Sympathetic Nerve Activity and Cardiac ArrhythmiasR42DA043391 · NIDA · ARRHYTHMOTECH, LLC · PI EVERETT, THOMAS H · 2016 to 2017
$1.5M
Subcutaneous nerve stimulation for arrhythmia control.U18TR002208 · NCATS · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI CHEN, PENG-SHENG · 2017 to 2018
$1.4M
NCATS NIH HHS U18 TR002208NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL139829NIDA NIH HHS R42 DA043391
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHigh output subcutaneous nerve stimulation (ScNS) remodels the stellate ganglia and suppresses cardiac arrhythmia.

objectiveThe purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that long duration low output ScNS causes cardiac nerve sprouting and increases plasma norepinephrine concentration and the duration of paroxysmal atrial tachycardia (PAT) in ambulatory dogs.

methodsWe prospectively randomized 22 dogs (11 males and 11 females) into 5 different output groups for 2 months of ScNS: 0 mA (sham) (n = 6), 0.25 mA (n = 4), 1.5 mA (n = 4), 2.5 mA (n = 4), and 3.5 mA (n = 4).

resultsAs compared with baseline, the changes in the durations of PAT episodes per 48 hours were significantly different among different groups (sham, -5.0 ± 9.5 seconds; 0.25 mA, 95.5 ± 71.0 seconds; 1.5 mA, -99.3 ± 39.6 seconds; 2.5 mA, -155.3 ± 87.8 seconds; and 3.5 mA, -76.3 ± 44.8 seconds; P < .001). The 3.5 mA group had a greater reduction in sinus heart rate than did the sham group (-29.8 ± 15.0 beats/min vs -14.5 ± 3.0 beats/min; P = .038). Immunohistochemical studies showed that the 0.25 mA group had a significantly increased while 2.5 mA and 3.5 mA stimulation had significantly reduced growth-associated protein 43 nerve densities in both atria and ventricles. The plasma norepinephrine concentrations in the 0.25 mA group was 5063.0 ± 4366.0 pg/mL, which was significantly higher than that in the other groups of dogs (739.3 ± 946.3; P = .009). There were no significant differences in the effects of simulation between males and females.

conclusionIn ambulatory dogs, low output ScNS causes cardiac nerve sprouting and increases plasma norepinephrine concentration and the duration of PAT episodes while high output ScNS is antiarrhythmic.

Indexed as

Atrial FibrillationSympathetic Nervous SystemTachycardia, ParoxysmalTranscutaneous Electric Nerve StimulationAnimalsDisease Models, AnimalDogsElectrocardiographyHeart RateMaleCardiac nerve sproutingExcitotoxicityImmunostainingNerve sproutingNeuromodulation

Identifiers

PMID30818091
PMCPMC6667287
OpenAlexW2916017003

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.