Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30817974›Full record

ArticlePhysiology & behavior2019

Portion size and meal consumption in domesticated dogs: An experimental study.

Inge Kersbergen, Alexander J German, Carri Westgarth, Eric Robinson

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physiology & behavior, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Inge KersbergenPsychological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK; School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK. Electronic address: i.kersbergen@sheffield.ac.uk.
Alexander J GermanInstitute of Veterinary Science, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK; Institute of Ageing and Chronic Disease, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Carri WestgarthInstitute of Veterinary Science, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK; Institute of Infection and Global Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Eric RobinsonPsychological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
University of Liverpool · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/N000218/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Increases in food portion sizes have been identified as a possible contributor to the increased prevalence of obesity in humans. However, little is known about the origin of behavioural tendencies to overeat from larger portion sizes or whether other non-human animals are affected by meal portion size. In the present experimental study, we examined the effect that larger portion sizes have on meal consumption among domesticated dogs (N = 32). Dogs were fed three meals that varied in size on different occasions (150%, 200% and 300% of usual portion size). A repeated measures design was used and food consumption was measured for each meal. Portion size positively affected food consumption, with dogs eating significantly more food as the portion size of meal increased. The effect of portion size on food consumption was also observed when the dogs that finished all available food were excluded from analyses, however not among dogs who did not finish any of the meals. We conclude that the influence larger portions have on food consumption observed in humans is also observed in domesticated dogs. However, it is unclear whether portion size directly biases the amount of food dogs choose to consume, as has been suggested in humans. Further research is now warranted to examine commonalities between human and non-human animal eating behaviour to understand shared behavioural tendencies and their origins.

Indexed as

MealsPortion SizeAnimalsDogsEatingEnergy IntakeFeeding BehaviorFemaleMalePetsAnimalsDogsFeeding behaviourFood intakePortion size

Identifiers

PMID30817974
PMCPMC6488012
OpenAlexW2920566336

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.