Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30817809›Full record

ArticlePLoS pathogens2019

Complete protection of the BALB/c and C57BL/6J mice against Ebola and Marburg virus lethal challenges by pan-filovirus T-cell epigraph vaccine.

Md Niaz Rahim, Edmund G Wee, Shihua He, Jonathan Audet, Kevin Tierney, Nathifa Moyo, Zara Hannoun, Alison Crook, Andrea Baines, Bette Korber and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS pathogens, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. EnhancedJournal of virology · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Adenovirus-based vaccines-a platform for pandemic preparedness against emerging viral pathogens.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2022
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 4 countries.

Md Niaz RahimNational Microbiology Laboratory, Public Health Agency of Canada, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
Edmund G WeeThe Jenner Institute, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Shihua HeNational Microbiology Laboratory, Public Health Agency of Canada, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
Jonathan AudetNational Microbiology Laboratory, Public Health Agency of Canada, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-0743-7489
Kevin TierneyNational Microbiology Laboratory, Public Health Agency of Canada, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
Nathifa MoyoThe Jenner Institute, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Zara HannounThe Jenner Institute, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-3595-8476
Alison CrookThe Jenner Institute, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-9724-8309
Andrea BainesThe Jenner Institute, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Bette KorberLos Alamo National Laboratory, Theoretical Biology and Biophysics, Los Alamos, New Mexico, United States of America.
Xiangguo QiuNational Microbiology Laboratory, Public Health Agency of Canada, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-5578-9999
Tomáš HankeThe Jenner Institute, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-6076-9546
University of Oxford · GBPublic Health Agency of Canada · CALos Alamos National Laboratory · US

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/N023668/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There are a number of vaccine candidates under development against a small number of the most common outbreak filoviruses all employing the virus glycoprotein (GP) as the vaccine immunogen. However, antibodies induced by such GP vaccines are typically autologous and limited to the other members of the same species. In contrast, T-cell vaccines offer a possibility to design a single pan-filovirus vaccine protecting against all known and even likely existing, but as yet unencountered members of the family. Here, we used a cross-filovirus immunogen based on conserved regions of the filovirus nucleoprotein, matrix and polymerase to construct simian adenovirus- and poxvirus MVA-vectored vaccines, and in a proof-of-concept study demonstrated a protection of the BALB/c and C57BL/6J mice against high, lethal challenges with Ebola and Marburg viruses, two distant members of the family, by vaccine-elicited T cells in the absence of GP antibodies.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralEbola VaccinesEbolavirusFemaleFiloviridaeHemorrhagic Fever, EbolaImmunity, CellularMaleMarburgvirusMiceMice, Inbred BALB CMice, Inbred C57BLProof of Concept StudyT-LymphocytesAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralEbola VaccinesViral Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID30817809
PMCPMC6394903
OpenAlexW2916881678

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.