Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30817064›Full record

ArticleHaemophilia : the official journal of the World Federation of Hemophilia2019

Newborn screening for haemophilia: The views of families and adults living with haemophilia in the UK.

Felicity K Boardman, Rachel Hale, Philip J Young

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Haemophilia : the official journal of the World Federation of Hemophilia, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Newborn screening for haemophilia: The views of families and adults living with haemophilia in the UK.Haemophilia : the official journal of the World Federation of Hemophilia · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Felicity K BoardmanDivision of Health Sciences, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3268-6276
Rachel HaleDivision of Health Sciences, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
Philip J YoungSchool of Life Sciences, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.

Funding

Wellcome Trust 203384/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAs genomic sequencing become more efficient and cost-effective, the number of conditions identified through newborn screening globally is set to dramatically increase. Haemophilia is a candidate condition; however, very little is known about the attitudes of the haemophilia community towards screening.

aimThis study aimed to outline the perspectives of adults with haemophilia and their families towards newborn screening.

methodsA paper and online survey on screening were distributed to every family known to the Haemophilia Society UK. Data collection occurred between January and June 2018. In total, 327 participants completed the survey: 76% were a relative of a person with haemophilia and 24% had haemophilia themselves; 83% were living with haemophilia A and 17% with haemophilia B.

resultsThe vast majority supported newborn screening (77%) and preferred it to other forms of screening (preconception or prenatal). Participants supported newborn screening primarily because they viewed it as a means to facilitate early support and treatment, facilitate informed decisions about future pregnancies and prevent the "diagnostic odyssey." The 23% who did not support the screen did not associate these particular benefits with newborn screening.

conclusionHaemophilia emerged from this analysis as a condition that the vast majority of participants considered a "liveable" disability and one best suited to newborn screening programmes that could improve support to affected families rather than reduce the birth rate of affected children.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedFamilyFemaleGenetic TestingHemophilia AHemophilia BHumansInfant, NewbornMaleMiddle AgedNeonatal ScreeningSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited KingdomYoung Adultattitudesbloodspotethicsgeneticshaemophilianewborn screeningsocial implications

Identifiers

PMID30817064
PMCPMC6487806

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.