Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30816723›Full record

ArticleDevelopmental psychology2019

Siblings reared apart: A sibling comparison study on rearing environment differences.

Misaki N Natsuaki, Jenae M Neiderhiser, Gordon T Harold, Daniel S Shaw, David Reiss, Leslie D Leve

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Developmental psychology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Parenting in the Context of the Child: Genetic and Social Processes.Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The Early Growth and Development Study: A Dual-Family Adoption Study from Birth Through Adolescence.Twin research and human genetics : the official journal of the International Society for Twin Studies · 2019
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Misaki N NatsuakiDepartment of Psychology.
Jenae M NeiderhiserDepartment of Psychology.
Gordon T HaroldSchool of Psychology.
Daniel S ShawDepartment of Psychology.
David ReissChild Study Center.
Leslie D LeveCollege of Education.
University of California, Riverside · USUniversity of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

The Early Growth and Development Study Pediatric CohortUH3OD023389 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF OREGON · PI Jody M. Ganiban, Leslie Diane Leve · 2018 to 2026
$16.6M
The Early Growth and Development Study: Family Process, Genes and School EntryR01HD042608 · NICHD · OREGON SOCIAL LEARNING CENTER, INC. · PI CAPALDI, DEBORAH M. · 2002 to 2011
$14.9M
Translational Drug Abuse Prevention CenterP50DA035763 · NIDA · OREGON SOCIAL LEARNING CENTER, INC. · PI CHAMBERLAIN, PATRICIA, FISHER, PHILIP A · 2013 to 2017
$9.5M
The Early Growth and Development Study Pediatric CohortUG3OD023389 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF OREGON · PI GANIBAN, JODY M., LEVE, LESLIE DIANE · 2016 to 2024
$7.5M
Siblings Reared Apart: A Naturalistic Cross-Fostering Study of Young ChildrenR01DA035062 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF OREGON · PI LEVE, LESLIE DIANE · 2013 to 2016
$2.7M
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human DevelopmentNational Institutes of Health; Office of the DirectorNICHD NIH HHS R01 HD042608NIDA NIH HHS P50 DA035763NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA035062NIH HHS UG3 OD023389NIH HHS UH3 OD023389US PHS; National Institutes of Health; National Institute on Drug Abuse
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A plethora of studies with parents and children who are biologically related has shown that the family environment plays an important role in child development. However, scientists have long known that a rigorous examination of environmental effects requires research designs that go beyond studies of genetically linked family members. Harnessing the principles of sibling comparison and animal cross-fostering designs, we introduce a novel approach: the siblings-reared-apart design. Supplementing the traditional adoption design of adopted child and adoptive parents with a sample of the adopted children's birth parents who raised their biological child(ren) at home (i.e., biological siblings of adoptees), this design provides opportunities to evaluate the role of specific rearing environments. In this proof of concept approach, we tested whether rearing environments differed between adoptive and birth families. Using data from 118 sets of adoption-linked families, each consisting of an adoptive family and the adoptee's birth family, both of whom are raising at least a child in each home, we found that compared with families in the birth homes, (a) adoptive families had higher household incomes and maternal educational attainment; (b) adoptive mothers displayed more guiding parenting, less harsh parenting, and less maternal depression; and (c) socioeconomic differences between the two homes did not account for the behavioral differences in mothers. We discuss the potential of the sibling-reared-apart design to advance developmental science. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

Indexed as

AdoptionEnvironmentSiblingsAdultChildChild RearingDepressionFemaleHumansMaleMothersParentsSocioeconomic Factors

Identifiers

PMID30816723
PMCPMC6533126
OpenAlexW2918886242

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.