ArticleInternational journal of molecular medicine2019
[Corrigendum] Bradykinin receptors and EphB2/EphrinB2 pathway in response to high glucose‑induced osteoblast dysfunction and hyperglycemia‑induced bone deterioration in mice.
Article in International journal of molecular medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Interaction between diabetes and osteoporosis: imbalance between inflammation and bone remodeling.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2025Review
- Kallikrein-kinin system as a potential target for the treatment of intervertebral disc degeneration.European journal of medical research · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum for
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Subsequent to the publication of the above article, the authors have realized that the published version of Fig. 7 contained some incorrect data. Essentially, the images for Fig. 7B were selected incorrectly. The correct version of Fig. 7, as it should have been featured in the article, is shown opposite. The errors associated with this Figure did not have an impact on the overall meaning of the paper, or on the reported conclusions of this study. The authors regret that this figure was not corrected prior to the publication of this article, and apologize to the readership for the inconvenience caused. [the original article was published in International Journal of Molecular Medicine 37: 565‑574, 2016; DOI: 10.3892/ijmm.2016.2457].
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.