ArticleScientific reports2019
Identification of S-nitrosylation sites based on multiple features combination.
Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- A polygenic stacking classifier revealed the complicated platelet transcriptomic landscape of adult immune thrombocytopenia.Molecular therapy. Nucleic acids · 2022Article
- Biological Mechanisms ofAntioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Recent Advances in Predicting Protein S-Nitrosylation Sites.BioMed research international · 2021Review
- Role of Nitric Oxide Carried by Hemoglobin in Cardiovascular Physiology: Developments on a Three-Gas Respiratory Cycle.Circulation research · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Protein S-nitrosylation (SNO) is a typical reversible, redox-dependent and post-translational modification that involves covalent modification of cysteine residues with nitric oxide (NO) for the thiol group. Numerous experiments have shown that SNO plays a major role in cell function and pathophysiology. In order to rapidly analysis the big sets of data, the computing methods for identifying the SNO sites are being considered as necessary auxiliary tools. In this study, multiple features including Parallel correlation pseudo amino acid composition (PC-PseAAC), Basic kmer1 (kmer1), Basic kmer2 (kmer2), General parallel correlation pseudo amino acid composition (PC-PseAAC_G), Adapted Normal distribution Bi-Profile Bayes (ANBPB), Double Bi-Profile Bayes (DBPB), Bi-Profile Bayes (BPB), Incorporating Amino Acid Pairwise (IAAPair) and Position-specific Tri-Amino Acid Propensity(PSTAAP) were employed to extract the sequence information. To remove information redundancy, information gain (IG) was applied to evaluate the importance of amino acids, which is the information entropy of class after subtracting the conditional entropy for the given amino acid. The prediction performance of the SNO sites was found to be best by using the cross-validation and independent tests. In addition, we also calculated four commonly used performance measurements, i.e. Sensitivity (Sn), Specificity (Sp), Accuracy (Acc), and the Matthew's Correlation Coefficient (MCC). For the training dataset, the overall Acc was 83.11%, the MCC was 0.6617. For an independent test dataset, Acc was 73.17%, and MCC was 0.3788. The results indicate that our method is likely to complement the existing prediction methods and is a useful tool for effective identification of the SNO sites.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.