Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30816250›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Protecting maize from rootworm damage with the combined application of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, Pseudomonas bacteria and entomopathogenic nematodes.

Geoffrey Jaffuel, Nicola Imperiali, Kent Shelby, Raquel Campos-Herrera, Ryan Geisert, Monika Maurhofer, Joyce Loper, Christoph Keel, Ted C J Turlings, Bruce E Hibbard

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Biocontrol of citrus bacterial canker caused bySaudi journal of biological sciences · 2022
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Activity ofJournal of nematology · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Geoffrey JaffuelFARCE Laboratory, Institute of Biology, University of Neuchâtel, Neuchâtel, Switzerland.
Nicola ImperialiDepartment of Fundamental Microbiology, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Kent ShelbyBiological Control of Insects Research, US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Columbia, MO, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9859-3497
Raquel Campos-HerreraFARCE Laboratory, Institute of Biology, University of Neuchâtel, Neuchâtel, Switzerland.
Ryan GeisertBiological Control of Insects Research, US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Columbia, MO, USA.
Monika MaurhoferInstitute of Integrative Biology, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Joyce LoperDepartment of Botany and Plant Pathology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, USA.
Christoph KeelFARCE Laboratory, Institute of Biology, University of Neuchâtel, Neuchâtel, Switzerland.
Ted C J TurlingsDepartment of Fundamental Microbiology, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland. ted.turlings@unine.ch.ORCID 0000-0002-8315-785X
Bruce E HibbardPlant Genetics Research Unit, US Department of Agriculture-ARS, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA. Bruce.Hibbard@ars.usda.gov.ORCID 0000-0001-8067-4416

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diabrotica virgifera virgifera LeConte, the western corn rootworm (WCR), is the most destructive pest of maize in North America, and has recently spread across central Europe. Its subterranean larval stages are hard to reach with pesticides and it has evolved resistance to conventional management practices. The application of beneficial soil organisms is being considered as a sustainable and environmental friendly alternative. In a previous study, the combined application in wheat fields of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, entomopathogenic Pseudomonas bacteria, and entomopathogenic nematodes was found to promote growth and protection against a natural pest infestation, without negative cross effects. Because of the insect-killing capacity of the bacteria and nematodes, we hypothesized that the application of these organisms would have similar or even greater beneficial effects in WCR-infested maize fields. During three consecutive years (2015-2017), we conducted trials in Missouri (USA) in which we applied the three organisms, alone or in combinations, in plots that were artificially infested with WCR and in non-infested control plots. For two of the three trials, we found that in plots treated with entomopathogenic nematodes and/or entomopathogenic Pseudomonas bacteria, roots were less damaged than the roots of plants in control plots. During one year, WCR survival was significantly lower in plots treated with Pseudomonas than in control plots, and the surviving larvae that were recovered from these plots were lighter. The bacterial and nematodes treatments also enhanced yield, assessed as total grain weight, in one of the trials. The effects of the treatments varied considerable among the three years, but they were always positive for the plants.

Indexed as

Pest Control, BiologicalAnimalsColeopteraMycorrhizaeNematodaPlant DiseasesPseudomonasZea mays

Identifiers

PMID30816250
PMCPMC6395644

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.