ArticleScientific reports2019
Ordinal regression models for zero-inflated and/or over-dispersed count data.
Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Predictive Study on the Occurrence of Wheat Blossom Midges Based on Gene Expression Programming with Support Vector Machines.Insects · 2024Article
- A sex-linked supergene with large effects on sperm traits has little impact on reproductive traits in female zebra finches.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2024Article
- Modeling Zero-inflated Count Data Using Generalized Poisson and Ordinal Logistic Regression Models in Medical Research.Oman medical journal · 2024Article
- A unified Gaussian copula methodology for spatial regression analysis.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Longitudinal trajectories of prescription opioid misuse in adolescents.Drug and alcohol dependence · 2022Article
- Errors in aerial survey count data: Identifying pitfalls and solutions.Ecology and evolution · 2022Review
- Malaria transmission in landscapes with varying deforestation levels and timelines in the Amazon: a longitudinal spatiotemporal study.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Description of malaria vectors (Diptera: Culicidae) in two agricultural settlements in the Western Brazilian Amazon.Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de Sao Paulo · 2021Article
- Comparison of malaria incidence rates and socioeconomic-environmental factors between the states of Acre and Rondônia: a spatio-temporal modelling study.Malaria journal · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Count data commonly arise in natural sciences but adequately modeling these data is challenging due to zero-inflation and over-dispersion. While multiple parametric modeling approaches have been proposed, unfortunately there is no consensus regarding how to choose the best model. In this article, we propose a ordinal regression model (MN) as a default model for count data given that this model is shown to fit well data that arise from several types of discrete distributions. We extend this model to allow for automatic model selection (MN-MS) and show that the MN-MS model generates superior inference when compared to using the full model or more traditional model selection approaches. The MN-MS model is used to determine how human biting rate of mosquitoes, known to be able to transmit malaria, are influenced by environmental factors in the Peruvian Amazon. The MN-MS model had one of the best fit and out-of-sample predictive skill amongst all models. While A. darlingi is strongly associated with highly anthropized landscapes, all the other mosquito species had higher mean biting rates in landscapes with a lower fraction of exposed soil and urban area, revealing a striking shift in species composition. We believe that the MN and MN-MS models are valuable additions to the modelling toolkit employed by environmental modelers and quantitative ecologists.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.