Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30816143›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Evaluating a scale of excessive mind wandering among males and females with and without attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder from a population sample.

Florence D Mowlem, Jessica Agnew-Blais, Jean-Baptiste Pingault, Philip Asherson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Does Mind-Wandering Explain ADHD-Related Impairment in Adolescents?Child psychiatry and human development · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Florence D MowlemSocial, Genetic, and Developmental Psychiatry Centre (SGDP), Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK. florence.d.mowlem@kcl.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-5503-568X
Jessica Agnew-BlaisSocial, Genetic, and Developmental Psychiatry Centre (SGDP), Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Jean-Baptiste PingaultDivision of Psychology and Language Sciences, University College London, London, UK.
Philip AshersonSocial, Genetic, and Developmental Psychiatry Centre (SGDP), Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
King's College London · GBUniversity College London · GB

Funding

Department of Health 14/23/17Department of Health NF-SI-0616-10040Medical Research Council MR/P014100/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent studies highlight the role of excessive mind wandering in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and its association with impairment. We believe assessing mind wandering could be especially relevant to individuals, including many females, who present with less externalising manifestations of ADHD. Using a new measure based on ADHD patient reports, the Mind Excessively Wandering Scale (MEWS), we previously found adults with ADHD had elevated levels of mind wandering that contributed to impairment independently of core ADHD symptoms. Using data from an online general population survey, the current study assessed the factor-structure, reliability, validity and measurement invariance of the MEWS. We also investigated sex differences in mind wandering, as well as ADHD symptoms, impairment and wellbeing in those with and without ADHD. The MEWS had a unidimensional structure, was invariant across sex, age and ADHD status, and accounted for unique variance in impairment and wellbeing beyond core ADHD symptoms. Among those with ADHD, we found no evidence for sex differences in mind wandering and among those without ADHD males had higher scores. We also found similar levels of hyperactivity/impulsivity, emotional lability, and impairment in males and females with ADHD, but males reported greater inattention and lower wellbeing. Results suggest the MEWS is a reliable and valid instrument measuring the same construct across sex, age and ADHD status, which could aid diagnosis and monitoring of outcomes.

Indexed as

AttentionAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsAttention Deficit Disorder with HyperactivityEmotionsFemaleHumansImpulsive BehaviorMaleMiddle AgedSex FactorsYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID30816143
PMCPMC6395591
OpenAlexW2918529652

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.