Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30816142›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Reward cues readily direct monkeys' auditory performance resulting in broad auditory cortex modulation and interaction with sites along cholinergic and dopaminergic pathways.

Patrik Wikman, Teemu Rinne, Christopher I Petkov

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Value-Biased Competition in the Auditory System of the Brain.Journal of cognitive neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  7. Previously reward-associated sounds interfere with goal-directed auditory processing.Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006) · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Patrik WikmanDepartment of Psychology and Logopedics, University of Helsinki, 00014, Helsinki, Finland. patrik.wikman@helsinki.fi.
Teemu RinneTurku Brain and Mind Center, Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Turku, 20014, Turku, Finland. teemu.rinne@utu.fi.
Christopher I PetkovInstitute of Neuroscience, Newcastle University, NE1 7RU, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom. chris.petkov@ncl.ac.uk.
Newcastle University · GBUniversity of Helsinki · FIUniversity of Turku · FI

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/J009849/1National Centre for the Replacement, Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research NC/K000608/1Wellcome Trust 102961/Z/13/ZWellcome Trust WT092606AIA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In natural settings, the prospect of reward often influences the focus of our attention, but how cognitive and motivational systems influence sensory cortex is not well understood. Also, challenges in training nonhuman animals on cognitive tasks complicate cross-species comparisons and interpreting results on the neurobiological bases of cognition. Incentivized attention tasks could expedite training and evaluate the impact of attention on sensory cortex. Here we develop an Incentivized Attention Paradigm (IAP) and use it to show that macaque monkeys readily learn to use auditory or visual reward cues, drastically influencing their performance within a simple auditory task. Next, this paradigm was used with functional neuroimaging to measure activation modulation in the monkey auditory cortex. The results show modulation of extensive auditory cortical regions throughout primary and non-primary regions, which although a hallmark of attentional modulation in human auditory cortex, has not been studied or observed as broadly in prior data from nonhuman animals. Psycho-physiological interactions were identified between the observed auditory cortex effects and regions including basal forebrain sites along acetylcholinergic and dopaminergic pathways. The findings reveal the impact and regional interactions in the primate brain during an incentivized attention engaging auditory task.

Indexed as

CuesRewardAcetylcholineAcoustic StimulationAnimalsAttentionAuditory CortexAuditory PerceptionBasal ForebrainBrain MappingDopamineFeedback, PhysiologicalFunctional NeuroimagingMacaca mulattaMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleAcetylcholineDopamine

Identifiers

PMID30816142
PMCPMC6395775
OpenAlexW2919199831

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.