Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30816140›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Inferring Temporal Information from a Snapshot of a Dynamic Network.

Jithin K Sreedharan, Abram Magner, Ananth Grama, Wojciech Szpankowski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Revisiting Parameter Estimation in Biological Networks: Influence of Symmetries.IEEE/ACM transactions on computational biology and bioinformatics
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jithin K SreedharanCenter for Science of Information, Department of Computer Science, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA.
Abram MagnerDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Ananth GramaCenter for Science of Information, Department of Computer Science, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA.
Wojciech SzpankowskiCenter for Science of Information, Department of Computer Science, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA. szpan@purdue.edu.

Funding

Theoretical Foundations and Software Infrastructure for Biological Network DatabasesU01CA198941 · NCI · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI KOYUTURK, MEHMET · 2015 to 2017
$1.4M
NCI NIH HHS U01 CA198941
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The problem of reverse-engineering the evolution of a dynamic network, known broadly as network archaeology, is one of profound importance in diverse application domains. In analysis of infection spread, it reveals the spatial and temporal processes underlying infection. In analysis of biomolecular interaction networks (e.g., protein interaction networks), it reveals early molecules that are known to be differentially implicated in diseases. In economic networks, it reveals flow of capital and associated actors. Beyond these recognized applications, it provides analytical substrates for novel studies - for instance, on the structural and functional evolution of the human brain connectome. In this paper, we model, formulate, and rigorously analyze the problem of inferring the arrival order of nodes in a dynamic network from a single snapshot. We derive limits on solutions to the problem, present methods that approach this limit, and demonstrate the methods on a range of applications, from inferring the evolution of the human brain connectome to conventional citation and social networks, where ground truth is known.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsInformation DisseminationSystems AnalysisConnectomeHumansOnline Social NetworkingProtein Interaction Maps

Identifiers

PMID30816140
PMCPMC6395620

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.