Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30816062›Full record

ReviewJournal of neurotrauma2020

Pharmacological Optimization for Successful Traumatic Brain Injury Drug Development.

Samuel M Poloyac, Richard J Bertz, Lee A McDermott, Punit Marathe

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of neurotrauma, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. The Cerebral Protective Effect of Novel Erinacines fromAntioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  4. A role for decorin in improving motor deficits after traumatic brain injury.Matrix biology : journal of the International Society for Matrix Biology · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Increasing Rigor of Preclinical Research to Maximize Opportunities for Translation.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2023
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Samuel M PoloyacUniversity of Pittsburgh School of Pharmacy, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Richard J BertzUniversity of Pittsburgh School of Pharmacy, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Lee A McDermottUniversity of Pittsburgh School of Pharmacy, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Punit MaratheDepartment of Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.

Funding

20-HETE Formation Inhibitors in Cardiac ArrestR21NS107785 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI MCDERMOTT, LEE A, POLOYAC, SAMUEL M · 2018 to 2019
$744k
NINDS NIH HHS R21 NS107785
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this review is to highlight the pharmacological barrier to drug development for traumatic brain injury (TBI) and to discuss best practice strategies to overcome such barriers. Specifically, this article will review the pharmacological considerations of moving from the disease target "hit" to the "lead" compound with drug-like and central nervous system (CNS) penetrant properties.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiomarkersBrain Injuries, TraumaticDrug DevelopmentHumansNeuroprotective AgentsBiomarkersNeuroprotective Agentsbiomarkerdrug developmentpharmacokineticspharmacologytraumatic brain injury

Identifiers

PMID30816062
PMCPMC7698845

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.