ReviewClinical cardiology2019
Management of cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction: A review.
Review in Clinical cardiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
47 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Percutaneous Closure vs. Surgical Repair for Postinfarction Ventricular Septal Rupture: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Brazilian journal of cardiovascular surgery · 2023Pooled it
- Timing of initiation of intra-aortic balloon pump in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: A meta-analysis.Clinical cardiology · 2019Pooled it
- Assessing myocardial work to predict left ventricular remodeling after ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: associations with left atrial and left ventricular strain.Journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2026Article
- Predictive value of multivariate models of quantitative myocardial movement parameters for acute myocardial infarction in elderly patients with coronary artery disease.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2026Article
- Cardiogenic Shock: Clinical Management, Outcomes and Future Directions.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2026Review
- Factors that impact in-hospital mortality due to STEMI versus NSTEMI in a first percutaneous coronary intervention: survival analysis.Archivos de cardiologia de Mexico · 2026Article
- Value of Color Doppler Echocardiography for Predicting Heart Failure After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction.International journal of general medicine · 2026Article
- Managing the acute cardiac functional crisis: a comprehensive review of cardiogenic shock management strategies.European heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology · 2025Article
- In-Hospital Mortality Predictors in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction and Cardiogenic Shock Using Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump.Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia · 2025Observational
- Comprehensive nursing interventions enhance sleep quality in patients with arrhythmia following AMI.Medicine · 2025Observational
- FOS as a biomarker for myocardial infarction treatment with Deng's Yangxin Decoction: a systems biology-based analysis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
- Sevoflurane pretreatment alleviates hypoxia-reoxygenation-induced myocardial cell injury by upregulating miR-21-5p.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
- Differential expression of platelet CD147 in moderate altitude conditions: implications for coronary plaque stability assessment.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
- Survival benefit of IABP in pre- versus post-primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with cardiogenic shock.The Egyptian heart journal : (EHJ) : official bulletin of the Egyptian Society of Cardiology · 2024Article
- Impact of symptom duration and mechanical circulatory support on prognosis in cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction.Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation · 2024Article
- Article
- Left ventricular unloading via percutaneous assist device during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in acute myocardial infarction and cardiac arrest.The International journal of artificial organs · 2024Article
- Research progress on the natural products in the intervention of myocardial infarction.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Review
- Integrating genomic profiling to clinical data: assessing the impact of CD147 expression on plaque stability.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Article
- Machine learning-based prediction of mortality in acute myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite advances in percutaneous coronary interventions and their widespread use, mortality in patients presenting with acute myocardial infarction (MI) complicated by cardiogenic shock (CS) has remained very high, and treatment options are limited. Limited evidences exist, supporting many of the routinely used therapies in treating these patients. In the present article, we discuss CS complicating MI in general and an update on the currently available treatment options, including inotropes and vasopressor, coronary revascularization, mechanical circulatory support devices, mechanical complications, and long-term outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.