Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30815854›Full record

ArticleEvolution; international journal of organic evolution2019

Hybridization and introgression during density-dependent range expansion: European wildcats as a case study.

Claudio S Quilodrán, Beatrice Nussberger, Juan I Montoya-Burgos, Mathias Currat

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Evolution; international journal of organic evolution, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Claudio S QuilodránLaboratory of Anthropology, Genetics and Peopling History, Department of Genetics and Evolution, Anthropology Unit, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Beatrice NussbergerInstitute of Evolutionary Biology and Environmental Studies, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Juan I Montoya-BurgosLaboratory of Vertebrate Evolution, Department of Genetics and Evolution, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Mathias CurratLaboratory of Anthropology, Genetics and Peopling History, Department of Genetics and Evolution, Anthropology Unit, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.

Funding

Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung 31003A_141233Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung 31003A_156853Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung 31003A_182577Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung P2GEP3_168973
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Interbreeding between historically allopatric species with incomplete reproductive barriers may result when species expand their range. The genetic consequences of such hybridization depend critically on the dynamics of the range expansion. Hybridization models during range expansion have been developed but assume dispersal to be independent from neighboring population densities. However, organisms may disperse because they are attracted by conspecifics or because they prefer depopulated areas. Here, through spatially explicit simulations, we assess the effect of various density-dependent dispersal modes on the introgression between two species. We find huge introgression from the local species into the invasive one with all dispersal modes investigated, even when the hybridization rate is relatively low. This represents a general expectation for neutral genes even if the dispersal modes differ in colonization times and amount of introgression. Invasive individuals attracted by conspecifics need more time to colonize the whole area and are more introgressed by local genes, whereas the opposite is found for solitary individuals. We applied our approach to a recent expansion of European wildcats in the Jura Mountains and the hybridization with domestic cats. We show that the simulations explained better the observed level of introgression at nuclear, mtDNA, and Y chromosome markers, when using solitary dispersal for wildcats instead of random or gregarious dispersal, in accordance with ecological knowledge. Thus, use of density-dependent dispersal models increases the predictive power of the approach.

Indexed as

Animal DistributionHybridization, GeneticAnimalsCatsDNA, MitochondrialGenetic IntrogressionGenetic MarkersPopulation DensitySwitzerlandY ChromosomeDNA, MitochondrialGenetic MarkersDensity-dependent dispersalFelis silvestrisgene flowinvasive speciesspatially explicit simulation

Identifiers

PMID30815854
PMCPMC6594108

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.