ArticleClinical pharmacokinetics2019
Differences in Warfarin Pharmacodynamics and Predictors of Response Among Three Racial Populations.
Article in Clinical pharmacokinetics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Geographic Disparities in Evidence Investigating the Use of Biologics in Chronic Rhinosinusitis.Journal of otolaryngology - head & neck surgery = Le Journal d'oto-rhino-laryngologie et de chirurgie cervico-facialePooled it
- Pharmacometric Model-Based Sample Size Allocation for a Region of Interest in a Multi-Regional Phase 2 Trial: A Case Study of an Anti-Psoriatic Drug.CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology · 2025Trial
- Comparison of CYP2C9 activity between Ethiopian and non-Ethiopian Jews: an interethnic study of (Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- Early versus delayed anticoagulation treatment for people with non-valvular atrial fibrillation-related acute ischaemic stroke.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025Article
- Review
- Anticoagulation decision-making before non-cardiac surgery in patients with mechanical heart valve: A retrospective study.Heliyon · 2023Article
- Efficacy and safety of app-based remote warfarin management during COVID-19-related lockdown: a retrospective cohort study.Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2022Article
- CYP2C9*3 Increases the Ibuprofen Response of Hemodynamically Significant Patent Ductus Arteriosus in the Infants with Gestational Age of More Than 30 Weeks.Phenomics (Cham, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Racial Disparity in Drug Disposition in the Digestive Tract.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- Comparison of CYP2C9 Activity in Ethiopian and Non-Ethiopian Jews Using Phenytoin as a Probe.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors at 8 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPopulation differences in warfarin dosing requirement have been reported; however, unlike the pharmacokinetics (PK) of warfarin, the quantitative influences of pharmacodynamic (PD) factors on the anticoagulation response to warfarin in different ethnic populations are totally unknown.
methodsUsing population PK/PD analysis, we attempted to identify predictors of S-warfarin clearance [CL(S)] and half maximal effective concentration (EC
resultsSimilar to our previous findings, the median CL(S) was 30% lower in African American patients than Asian and White patients (169 vs. 243 and 234 mL/h, p < 0.01). EC
conclusionsAlthough there were contrasting racial differences in CL(S) and EC
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.