Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30815755›Full record

ReviewCurrent gastroenterology reports2019

Inflammation and Neoplasia of the Pouch in Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

Freeha Khan, Bo Shen

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current gastroenterology reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Pouchitis: Treatment dilemmas at different stages of the disease.United European gastroenterology journal · 2020
    Review
  9. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Freeha KhanDepartment of Gastroenterology/Hepatology/Nutrition, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Bo ShenDepartment of Gastroenterology/Hepatology/Nutrition, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA. shenb@ccf.org.
Cleveland Clinic · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewIleal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) is the standard restorative procedure after proctocolectomy in patients with inflammatory bowel disease who require colectomy. The ileal pouch is susceptible to a variety of adverse outcomes including mechanical insult, ischemia, and infectious agents. There is also a risk for developing low-grade dysplasia (LGD), high-grade dysplasia (HGD), or even adenocarcinoma in the pouch. The purpose of this review is to highlight risk factors, clinical presentation, surveillance, and treatment of pouch neoplasia. RECENT

findingsPatients with pre-colectomy colitis-associated neoplasia are at high risk for developing pouch neoplasia. Other purported risk factors include the presence of family history of colorectal cancer, the presence of concurrent primary sclerosing cholangitis, chronic pouchitis, cuffitis, or Crohn's disease of the pouch. Pouch adenocarcinoma tends to have a poor prognosis. It is recommended to have a combined clinical, endoscopic, and histologic approach in diagnosis and management. Surveillance and management algorithms of pouch neoplasia are proposed, based on the risk stratification.

Indexed as

Colonic PouchesColonoscopyColorectal NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerHumansInflammatory Bowel DiseasesPouchitisProctocolectomy, RestorativeRisk FactorsDysplasiaHistopathologyIleal pouchInflammatory bowel diseaseNeoplasiaPouchoscopySurveillance

Identifiers

PMID30815755
OpenAlexW2919782045

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.