ReviewCurrent cardiology reports2019
Recent Advances in Congenital Heart Surgery: Alternative Perfusion Strategies for Infant Aortic Arch Repair.
Review in Current cardiology reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Results of stage I palliation of single ventricle with hypoplastic left heart complex managed with a beating heart strategy.Translational pediatrics · 2026Article
- Intestinal Tissue Damage Reduction After Distal Perfusion for Aortic Arch Surgery in a Neonatal Porcine Model.Biomedicines · 2026Article
- Acute Kidney Injury after High-Flow Regional Cerebral Perfusion in Neonatal and Infant Aortic Arch Repair.Interactive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery · 2022Article
- Commentary: On aortic uncrossing: New variation on an old controversy.JTCVS techniques · 2021Article
- In Vitro Evaluation of Flow Distribution in All-Region Perfusion during the Norwood Operation.The journal of extra-corporeal technology · 2020Article
- Commentary: Help a sister out: Dual cannulation strategy for neonatal heart surgery in a conjoined twin.JTCVS techniques · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewThis paper will discuss current cannulation strategies for infant aortic arch repair and compare them to more traditionally used techniques. RECENT
findingsAortic arch reconstruction in infants has traditionally involved deep hypothermic circulatory arrest which results in total body ischemia. This has been associated with an increased risk of morbidity including bleeding, renal dysfunction, and neurologic injury. Advances in perfusion techniques have allowed for preserved perfusion to the brain during arch repair. Current techniques have further evolved that allow for continuous perfusion of the heart and even the lower body during arch reconstruction. With current techniques, aortic arch reconstruction in infants can be performed with continuous perfusion to the brain, heart, and lower body. Further technical refinements will be helpful, and study is necessary to evaluate the benefit of these strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.