ReviewCurrent cardiology reports2019
Quantification of PET Myocardial Blood Flow.
Review in Current cardiology reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Evaluation of non-invasive imaging parameters in coronary microvascular disease: a systematic review.BMC medical imaging · 2021Pooled it
- Effect of a single ultra processed meal on myocardial endothelial function, adenosine mediated effects and cognitive performances.Scientific reports · 2025Trial
- Patient-centric performance and interpretation of positron emission tomography /computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging: a clinical consensus statement of the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging of the European Society of Cardiology.European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice · 2026Review
- Effect of sodium-glucose Co-transporter 2 inhibitors on coronary microcirculation.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Review
- Visually assessed ischemia on cardiac magnetic resonance, but not quantitative perfusion metrics, predicts symptomatic improvement in coronary artery bypass.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2025Article
- Modeling cardiac microcirculation for the simulation of coronary flow and 3D myocardial perfusion.Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology · 2024Article
- Review
- Characteristics and key differences between patient populations receiving imaging modalities for coronary artery disease diagnosis in the US.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2023Article
- Non-invasive diagnosis of vasospastic angina.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2023Review
- Development and evaluation of a radiomics model of restingAnnals of translational medicine · 2022Article
- On the relationship between coronary microvascular disease and obesity.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2022Article
- A Narrative Review of the Classical and Modern Diagnostic Methods of the No-Reflow Phenomenon.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Let's embrace optical imaging: a growing branch on the clinical molecular imaging tree.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2021Article
- A big step towards clinical implementation of myocardial blood flow quantification with CZT SPECT.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2021Article
- The potential of regional myocardial blood flow measurement with SPECT.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2021Article
- Comparison of myocardial blood flow and flow reserve with dobutamine and dipyridamole stress using rubidium-82 positron emission tomography.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2021Article
- Research Progress of Imaging Methods for Detection of Microvascular Angina Pectoris in Diabetic Patients.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2021Review
- Network Medicine: A Clinical Approach for Precision Medicine and Personalized Therapy in Coronary Heart Disease.Journal of atherosclerosis and thrombosis · 2020Review
- Microvascular Angina Diagnosed by Absolute PET Myocardial Blood Flow Quantification.Current cardiology reports · 2020Review
- The potential for PET-guided revascularization of coronary artery disease.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purpose of reviewThe aim of this review is to provide an update on quantification of myocardial blood flow (MBF) with positron emission tomography (PET) imaging. Technical and clinical aspects of flow quantification with PET are reviewed. RECENT
findingsThe diagnostic and prognostic values of myocardial flow quantification have been established in numerous studies and in various populations. MBF quantification has also shown itself to be particularly useful in the assessment of coronary microvascular dysfunction and in evaluation of cardiac allograft vasculopathy. Overall, myocardial flow reserve (MFR) and hyperemic MBF can lead to improved risk stratification by providing information complementary to that of other markers of disease severity, such as fractional flow reserve. Flow quantification enhances MPI's ability to detect both significant epicardial disease and microvascular dysfunction. With recent technological and methodological advances, flow quantification with PET is no longer restricted to cyclotron-equipped academic centers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30815744What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.