Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30815669›Full record

ReviewEuropean heart journal2019

Deep learning for cardiovascular medicine: a practical primer.

Chayakrit Krittanawong, Kipp W Johnson, Robert S Rosenson, Zhen Wang, Mehmet Aydar, Usman Baber, James K Min, W H Wilson Tang, Jonathan L Halperin, Sanjiv M Narayan

4 registry-linked trialsAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European heart journal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 4 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 179 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
179citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05316025 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Grenoble Cardiovascular Digital Health Data Observatory

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorUniversity Hospital, GrenobleRan2022 to 2025Enrolled5,000ConditionsCardiovascular Diseases, Digital, Health Data, Observatory
NCT06216847 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Clinical Outcomes of Patients With Coronary Artery Disease Cohort Study

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorShenyang Northern HospitalRan2024 to 2030Enrolled10,000ConditionsCoronary Heart Disease (CHD)
NCT06377319 not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Clinical Validation of an Artificial Intelligence Based Decision Support System for Predicting Risk, Diagnosis, and Progression of Heart Failure

TypeobservationalSponsorCoventry UniversityRan2024 to 2027Enrolled1,600ConditionsHeart FailureArmsCardiac Output Response to Stress (CORS) test
NCT06993415 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Optimize Risk Prediction After Myocardial Infarction Through Artificial Intelligence and Multidimensional Evaluation: The ORACLE Study

TypeobservationalSponsorFundación Pública Andaluza para la Investigación de Málaga en Biomedicina y SaludRan2025 to 2028Enrolled750ConditionsMyocardial Infarction (MI)Armsdata collection
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

179 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Advances in Nephrology.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

119 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Chayakrit KrittanawongDepartment of Internal Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 1 Gustave L. Levy Pl, New York, NY, USA.
Kipp W JohnsonDepartment of Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Institute for Next Generation Healthcare, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Robert S RosensonDepartment of Cardiovascular Diseases, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Mount Sinai Hospital, Mount Sinai Heart, New York, NY, USA.
Zhen WangRobert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Mehmet AydarDepartment of Computer Science, Kent State University, Kent, OH, USA.
Usman BaberDepartment of Cardiovascular Diseases, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Mount Sinai Hospital, Mount Sinai Heart, New York, NY, USA.
James K MinDepartment of Radiology, New York-Presbyterian Hospital and Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
W H Wilson TangDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Heart and Vascular Institute, Cleveland Clinic, OH, USA.
Jonathan L HalperinDepartment of Cardiovascular Diseases, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Mount Sinai Hospital, Mount Sinai Heart, New York, NY, USA.
Sanjiv M NarayanCardiovascular Institute and Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA, USA.

Funding

The Dynamics of Human Atrial FibrillationR01HL083359 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI Sanjiv M Narayan · 2008 to 2026
$7.9M
The Maintenance of Human Atrial FibrillationK24HL103800 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI NARAYAN, SANJIV M · 2010 to 2019
$1.9M
NHLBI NIH HHS K24 HL103800NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL083359
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deep learning (DL) is a branch of machine learning (ML) showing increasing promise in medicine, to assist in data classification, novel disease phenotyping and complex decision making. Deep learning is a form of ML typically implemented via multi-layered neural networks. Deep learning has accelerated by recent advances in computer hardware and algorithms and is increasingly applied in e-commerce, finance, and voice and image recognition to learn and classify complex datasets. The current medical literature shows both strengths and limitations of DL. Strengths of DL include its ability to automate medical image interpretation, enhance clinical decision-making, identify novel phenotypes, and select better treatment pathways in complex diseases. Deep learning may be well-suited to cardiovascular medicine in which haemodynamic and electrophysiological indices are increasingly captured on a continuous basis by wearable devices as well as image segmentation in cardiac imaging. However, DL also has significant weaknesses including difficulties in interpreting its models (the 'black-box' criticism), its need for extensive adjudicated ('labelled') data in training, lack of standardization in design, lack of data-efficiency in training, limited applicability to clinical trials, and other factors. Thus, the optimal clinical application of DL requires careful formulation of solvable problems, selection of most appropriate DL algorithms and data, and balanced interpretation of results. This review synthesizes the current state of DL for cardiovascular clinicians and investigators, and provides technical context to appreciate the promise, pitfalls, near-term challenges, and opportunities for this exciting new area.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAlgorithmsArtificial IntelligenceAtrial FibrillationBig DataCardiac Imaging TechniquesClinical Decision-MakingDeep LearningDiagnostic ImagingDiagnostic Techniques, CardiovascularFemaleGuidelines as TopicHeart FailureHumansIncidenceArtificial intelligenceBig dataCardiovascular medicineDeep learningPrecision medicine

Identifiers

PMID30815669
PMCPMC6600129

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.