ArticleCurrent medical mycology2018
Antifungal effect of the bark and root extracts of
Article in Current medical mycology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Antiparasitic Potential of Bioactive Compounds FromJournal of parasitology research · 2026Review
- Natural Antioxidant, Antibacterial, and Antiproliferative Activities of Ethanolic Extracts fromPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- The Effect ofJournal of dentistry (Shiraz, Iran) · 2022Article
- Ethyl Acetate Fraction ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Phytochemical Profile and Antimicrobial Activities of Edible MushroomEvidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2021Article
- Comparison of the fungicidal efficacy of photodynamic therapy with methylene blue, silver nanoparticle, and their conjugation on oralCurrent medical mycology · 2020Article
- Comparison of antifungal efficacy of ethanolic extracts ofCurrent medical mycology · 2020Article
- A Study of the Disruptive Effect of the Acetate Fraction ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2020Article
- Evaluation of antifungal efficacy of albedo extract ofJournal of oral and maxillofacial pathology : JOMFPArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background and purposeOral candidiasis is one of the most common fungal infections in humans. The treatment and prophylaxis of the patients suffering from this infection require the identification of new anti- MATERIALS AND
methodsMinimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of the ethanolic, methanolic, and aqueous extracts of the bark and root of
resultsThe MIC50 and MIC90 values for the methanolic and ethanolic extracts of the bark and root of
conclusionAs the findings indicated, the methanolic and ethanolic extracts of the bark and root of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.