Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30815606›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2019

Insights into needs of business travelers to China from calls to a medical assistance provider.

Linda Sanftenberg, Michaela Kramer, Stefan Esser, Jörg Schelling

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Linda SanftenbergInstitut für Allgemeinmedizin, Klinikum der Universität München, Germany.
Michaela KramerInstitut für Allgemeinmedizin, Klinikum der Universität München, Germany.
Stefan EsserInternational SOS GmbH, Neu-Isenburg, Germany.
Jörg SchellingInstitut für Allgemeinmedizin, Klinikum der Universität München, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough 17.5% of German travelers were business travelers in the years 2011-2013, little is known about their pathologies. Recent publications indicate that infections are the primary health issue in general travelers. Our aim was to investigate whether business travelers from Germany to China also primarily suffer from infections.

methodsFrom 2011 to 2013, 587 calls for service of German business travelers to China were collected by a medical assistance provider. 482 of these calls were evaluated regarding demographics, reported diseases and conditions and the type of service provided by the medical assistance company.

resultsThe most common reasons for calls for service were "factors influencing health status and contact with health service" (18.8%), "injury and poisoning" (16.0%) as well as "symptoms, signs, and ill-defined conditions" (13.7%). Most patients asked for "medical advice" (37.8%), referral to "outpatient care" (25.1%) or "inpatient care" (16.6%). "Evacuation and/or repatriation" was required mainly due to "injury and poisoning" (n = 12), "diseases of the circulatory system" (n = 5) or "mental disorders" (n = 3).

conclusionGerman business travelers to China are seeking primarily administrative support from a medical assistance provider and are mostly affected by non-infectious diseases. Pre-travel preparation of such travelers need to place more emphasis on non-communicable health risks and prevention.

Indexed as

Infectious diseasePublic health

Identifiers

PMID30815606
PMCPMC6378333
OpenAlexW2914650223

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.