Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30815564›Full record

ArticleEndocrinology, diabetes & metabolism2018

Different patterns of second-line treatment in type 2 diabetes after metformin monotherapy in Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden (D360 Nordic): A multinational observational study.

Frederik Persson, Johan Bodegard, Jorma T Lahtela, Thomas Nyström, Marit E Jørgensen, Majken Linneman Jensen, Hanne L Gulseth, Marcus Thuresson, Fabian Hoti, David Nathanson and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Endocrinology, diabetes & metabolism, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Trends in diabetes medication use in Australia, Canada, England, and Scotland: a repeated cross-sectional analysis in primary care.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Frederik PerssonSteno Diabetes Center Copenhagen Gentofte Denmark.
Johan BodegardAstraZeneca Nordic-Baltic Oslo Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-5423-3967
Jorma T LahtelaTampere University Hospital Tampere Finland.
Thomas NyströmDepartment of Clinical Science and Education Södersjukhuset, Karolinska Institutet Stockholm Sweden.
Marit E JørgensenSteno Diabetes Center Copenhagen Gentofte Denmark.
Majken Linneman JensenSteno Diabetes Center Copenhagen Gentofte Denmark.
Hanne L GulsethOslo University Hospital Oslo Norway.
Marcus ThuressonStatisticon AB Uppsala Sweden.
Fabian HotiStatFinn & EPID Research Espoo Finland.
David NathansonDepartment of Clinical Science and Education Södersjukhuset, Karolinska Institutet Stockholm Sweden.
Anna NorhammarKarolinska Institutet Stockholm Sweden.
Kåre I BirkelandOslo University Hospital Oslo Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-3002-6933
Johan G ErikssonDepartment of General Practice and Primary Health Care University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland.
Jan W ErikssonDepartment of Medical Sciences Uppsala University Uppsala Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-2639-9481

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsThe understanding of second-line use of glucose-lowering drugs (GLDs) in the general population with type 2 diabetes (T2D) treatment is important as recent results have shown cardiovascular benefits with sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT-2i) and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA). Our aim was to describe second-line GLD treatment patterns in four Nordic countries.

methodsAll T2D patients treated with GLD between 2006 and 2015 were identified in prescribed drug registries in Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden, and linked with National Patient and Cause of Death Registries. Second-line treatment was defined as a prescription of a second GLD class following ≥6 months of metformin monotherapy. Index was the date of first dispense of the second-line drug.

resultsA rapid uptake of newer GLDs (GLP-1RA, DPP-4i and SGLT-2i) over the 10-year observation period was seen in Denmark, Finland and Norway, while slower in Sweden. In 2015, 33,880 (3.1%) of 1,078,692 T2D patients initiated second-line treatment, and newer GLDs were more commonly used in Finland (92%), Norway (71%) and Denmark (70%) vs Sweden (44%). In 2015, the use of older GLDs (insulin and sulphonylureas) was 7-fold greater in Sweden compared to Finland (49% vs 7%), and 1.6-fold greater compared with Denmark and Norway (49% vs 30% and 29%, respectively).

conclusionsDespite comparable demography and healthcare systems in four neighbouring countries, surprisingly large differences in second-line use of newer GLDs were found. With recent evidence of potential cardiovascular benefits with newer GLDs, such differences may have an important impact on cardiovascular outcomes.

Indexed as

observational studysecond‐lineSGLT2type 2 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID30815564
PMCPMC6354817

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.