Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30815556›Full record

ArticleEndocrinology, diabetes & metabolism2018

Nudging people with Type 2 diabetes towards better self-management through personalized risk communication: A pilot randomized controlled trial in primary care.

Thomas Rouyard, Jose Leal, Richard Baskerville, Carmelo Velardo, Dario Salvi, Alastair Gray

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Endocrinology, diabetes & metabolism, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06607497 naactive not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Better Risk Perception Via Patient Similarity to Control Hyperglycemia and Sustained by Telemonitoring

TypeinterventionalSponsorSingHealth PolyclinicsRan2024 to 2026Enrolled360ConditionsDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2ArmsIntervention using an AI enabled risk communication tool (PERDICT.AI), Telemonitoring with Primary Tech Enhanced Care (PTEC-DM)
NCT06837428 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Peer Comparison-based Risk Communication (PRICOM): A Study Protocol to Evaluate the Feasibility of Delivering a Risk Communication Intervention in the Primary Care Setting for Adults With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

TypeinterventionalSponsorSingHealth PolyclinicsRan2023 to 2024Enrolled40ConditionsDiabetes Type 2ArmsPeer comparison-based Risk Communication (PRICOM)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The War on Diabetic Retinopathy: Where Are We Now?Asia-Pacific journal of ophthalmology (Philadelphia, Pa.)
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Thomas RouyardHealth Economics Research Centre Nuffield Department of Population Health University of Oxford Oxford UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6412-1360
Jose LealHealth Economics Research Centre Nuffield Department of Population Health University of Oxford Oxford UK.
Richard BaskervilleNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences University of Oxford Oxford UK.
Carmelo VelardoInstitute of Biomedical Engineering Department of Engineering Science University of Oxford Oxford UK.
Dario SalviInstitute of Biomedical Engineering Department of Engineering Science University of Oxford Oxford UK.
Alastair GrayHealth Economics Research Centre Nuffield Department of Population Health University of Oxford Oxford UK.

Funding

Department of Health NIHR-IPF-2013-07-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo assess the feasibility in routine primary care consultation and investigate the effect on risk recall and self-management of a new type of risk communication intervention based on behavioural economics ("nudge-based") for people with Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).

methodsForty adults with poorly controlled T2DM (HbA1c > 7.5%) were randomized to receive a personalized, nudge-based risk communication intervention (n = 20) or standard care (n = 20). Risk recall and self-management were evaluated at baseline and 12 weeks after the intervention.

resultsBoth in terms of feasibility and acceptability, this new risk communication intervention was very satisfactory. Study retention rate after 12 weeks was very high (90%) and participants were highly satisfied with the intervention (4.4 out of 5 on the COMRADE scale). Although not powered to identify significant between-group effects, the intervention significantly improved risk recall after 12 weeks and intentions to make lifestyle changes (dietary behaviour) compared to standard care.

conclusionsThis pilot study provides the first evidence of the feasibility of implementing in primary care a nudge-based risk communication intervention for people with T2DM. Based on the promising results observed, an adequately powered trial to determine the effectiveness of the intervention on long-term self-management is judged feasible. As a result of this feasibility study, some minor adaptations to the intervention and study methods that would help to facilitate a definitive trial are also reported.

Indexed as

behavioural economicspilot randomized trialprimary carerisk communicationself‐managementType 2 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID30815556
PMCPMC6354823

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.