ReviewWorld journal of clinical oncology2019
Pancreatic cancer screening in patients with presumed branch-duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms.
Review in World journal of clinical oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cystic pancreatic lesions: MR imaging findings and management.Insights into imaging · 2021Review
- Review
- Role of transabdominal ultrasonography in the diagnosis of pancreatic cystic lesions.Journal of medical ultrasonics (2001) · 2020Review
- Pancreatic Cancer Surveillance: Who, When, and How.Current treatment options in gastroenterology · 2019Review
- Nanomedicine for Imaging and Therapy of Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2019Review
- New-onset diabetes is a predictive risk factor for pancreatic lesions in high-risk individuals: An observational cohort study.Endoscopic ultrasoundArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Because delayed diagnosis is one of the causes of poor prognosis in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), early detection is a key for overall improvement of prognosis. Towards this end, periodic screening is recommended for individuals considered high-risk for PDAC. Advances in diagnostic imaging modalities have increased the frequency of incidental findings of pancreatic cysts, including the intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) - a major risk factor of PDAC, having 1% annual prevalence of concomitance with IPMN. Proper retainment of patients with IPMN and regular follow-up by routine imaging examination will likely improve early detection and better prognosis of PDAC. Unfortunately, current guidelines only address management of PDAC derived from IPMN and overlook PDAC concomitant with IPMN. Screening of patients with IPMN, by endoscopic ultrasonography (currently the most reliable modality for detecting small PDAC), may facilitate early detection of both IPMN-derived and -concomitant PDAC. Prospective studies to evaluate the usefulness of endoscopic ultrasonography in screening of IPMN-concomitant PDAC will also help in determining the optimal surveillance strategy for more widespread applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.