Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30815285›Full record

ArticleBMJ global health2019

An updated roadmap for MERS-CoV research and product development: focus on diagnostics.

Cassandra Kelly-Cirino, Laura T Mazzola, Arlene Chua, Christopher J Oxenford, Maria D Van Kerkhove

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ global health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. MERS-COV in the Middle East, a one health concept approach.One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. A framework for measuring timeliness in the outbreak response path: lessons learned from the Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS) epidemic, September 2012 to January 2019.Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Development of gold nanoparticle-based biosensors for COVID-19 diagnosis.Beni-Suef University journal of basic and applied sciences · 2022
    Review
  12. Consensus statement and recommendations on the treatment of COVID-19: 2021 update.Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA · 2022
    Review
  13. COVID-19 clinical and laboratory diagnosis overview.The Journal of the Egyptian Public Health Association · 2021
    Review
  14. The COVID-19 pandemic: prediction study based on machine learning models.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. The Recent Technologies to Curb the Second-Wave of COVID-19 Pandemic.IEEE access : practical innovations, open solutions · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Cassandra Kelly-CirinoEmerging Threats Programme, FIND, Geneva, Switzerland.
Laura T MazzolaEmerging Threats Programme, FIND, Geneva, Switzerland.
Arlene ChuaDepartment of Information, Evidence and Research, WHO, Geneva, Switzerland.
Christopher J OxenfordHealth Emergencies Programme, WHO, Lyon, France.
Maria D Van KerkhoveHealth Emergencies Programme, WHO, Geneva, Switzerland.
Foundation for Innovative New Diagnostics · CHMédecins Sans Frontières · CHWorld Health Organization · CHWorld Health Organization - Lyon Office · FR

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diagnostics play a central role in the early detection and control of outbreaks and can enable a more nuanced understanding of the disease kinetics and risk factors for the Middle East respiratory syndrome-coronavirus (MERS-CoV), one of the high-priority pathogens identified by the WHO. In this review we identified sources for molecular and serological diagnostic tests used in MERS-CoV detection, case management and outbreak investigations, as well as surveillance for humans and animals (camels), and summarised the performance of currently available tests, diagnostic needs, and associated challenges for diagnostic test development and implementation. A more detailed understanding of the kinetics of infection of MERS-CoV is needed in order to optimise the use of existing assays. Notably, MERS-CoV point-of-care tests are needed in order to optimise supportive care and to minimise transmission risk. However, for new test development, sourcing clinical material continues to be a major challenge to achieving assay validation. Harmonisation and standardisation of laboratory methods are essential for surveillance and for a rapid and effective international response to emerging diseases. Routine external quality assessment, along with well-characterised and up-to-date proficiency panels, would provide insight into MERS-CoV diagnostic performance worldwide. A defined set of Target Product Profiles for diagnostic technologies will be developed by WHO to address these gaps in MERS-CoV outbreak management.

Indexed as

in vitro diagnosticsMERS-CoVmiddle east respiratory syndrome-coronavirusoutbreak

Identifiers

PMID30815285
PMCPMC6361340
OpenAlexW2913392858

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.