Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30815246›Full record

ReviewTherapeutic advances in endocrinology and metabolism2019

Economics of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: a systematic review.

Enrique Grande, Ángel Díaz, Carlos López, Javier Munarriz, Juan-José Reina, Ruth Vera, Beatriz Bernárdez, Javier Aller, Jaume Capdevila, Rocio Garcia-Carbonero and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Therapeutic advances in endocrinology and metabolism, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis ofDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Enrique GrandeDepartment of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain.
Ángel DíazDepartment of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain.
Carlos LópezDepartment of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, Santander, Spain.
Javier MunarrizDepartment of Medical Oncology, Hospital Provincial de Castellón, Castellón, Spain.
Juan-José ReinaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Hospital Virgen Macarena, Sevilla, Spain.
Ruth VeraDepartment of Medical Oncology, Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.
Beatriz BernárdezDepartment of Pharmacy, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Javier AllerDepartment of Endocrinology, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro, Madrid, Spain.
Jaume CapdevilaVall d'Hebron University Hospital, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Rocio Garcia-CarboneroOncology Department, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, IIS imas12, UCM, CNIO, CIBERONC, Madrid, Spain.
Paula Jimenez FonsecaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Hospital Central de Asturias, Oviedo, Spain.
Marta Trapero-BertranResearch Institute for Evaluation and Public Policies (IRAPP), Universitat Internacional de Catalunya (UIC), Carrer de la Immaculada, 22, Barcelona, 08017, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9233-1776

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite current interest, enthusiasm and progress in the development of therapies for gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) neuroendocrine tumors (NETs), there are substantial gaps in the published literature regarding cost-of-illness analyses, economic evaluation and budget impact analyses. Compounding the issue is that data on resource utilization and cost-effectiveness of different diagnostic and therapeutic modalities for GEP-NETs are scarce.

methodsA systematic review on the economic impact of GEP-NETs was carried out using four databases:

resultsThe 14 studies selected included cost-of-illness analyses (

conclusionThere is a lack of data related to resource utilization in the field of GEP-NETs. Therefore, cost-effectiveness and budget impact studies of existing and emerging treatments are urgently needed to help the decision-making process for patients with NETs.

Indexed as

budget impactcost-of-illnesscostseconomic burdeneconomic evaluationgastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumorsresource utilizationsystematic review

Identifiers

PMID30815246
PMCPMC6381439

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.