Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30815206›Full record

ArticleAMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium2018

Computable Eligibility Criteria through Ontology-driven Data Access: A Case Study of Hepatitis C Virus Trials.

Hansi Zhang, Zhe He, Xing He, Yi Guo, David R Nelson, François Modave, Yonghui Wu, William Hogan, Mattia Prosperi, Jiang Bian

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Simulating Colorectal Cancer Trials Using Real-World Data.JCO clinical cancer informatics · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Deep propensity network using a sparse autoencoder for estimation of treatment effects.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review of Clinical Research Informatics.Yearbook of medical informatics · 2020
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Assessing the Validity of aAMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Hansi ZhangUniversity of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Zhe HeFlorida State University, Tallahassee, FL, USA.
Xing HeUniversity of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Yi GuoUniversity of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
David R NelsonFlorida State University, Tallahassee, FL, USA.
François ModaveUniversity of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Yonghui WuUniversity of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
William HoganUniversity of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Mattia ProsperiUniversity of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Jiang BianUniversity of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.

Funding

Systematic Analysis of Clinical Study Generalizability Assessment Methods with InformaticsR21AG061431 · NIA · FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI BIAN, JIANG, HE, ZHE · 2019 to 2020
$793k
NIA NIH HHS R21 AG061431
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The increasing adoption of electronic health record (EHR) systems and proliferation of clinical data offer unprecedented opportunities for cohort identification to accelerate patient recruitment. However, the effort required to translate trial eligibility criteria to the correct cohort identification queries for clinical investigators is substantial, at least in part due to the lack of clear definitions in both the free-text eligibility criteria and the data models used to structure the available data elements in target patient databases. We propose to adopt an ontology-driven data access approach that generates formal representations of the connections between the entities in eligibility criteria and the available data elements to (1) narrow the semantic gap between researchers' cohort identification needs and the underlying database nuances, and (2) render the eligibility criteria computable. We implemented our approach based on an analysis of the eligibility criteria from 77 Hepatitis C trials. We found that 4 major types of data manipulation queries and 4 temporal patterns covered all eligibility criteria that were computable. We built a prototype system that helps researchers write computable eligibility criteria and execute them against clinical data in real-time to find potential trial cohorts.

Indexed as

Clinical Trials as TopicHepatitis CPatient SelectionVocabulary, ControlledDatabases, FactualHepacivirusHumansResearch PersonnelSemantics

Identifiers

PMID30815206
PMCPMC6371316

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.