ArticleAMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium2018
The Sublanguage of Clinical Problem Lists: A Corpus Analysis.
Article in AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
.Summary-level clinical text is an important part of the overall clinical record as it provides a condensed and efficient view into the issues pertinent to the patient, or their "problem list." These problem lists contain a wealth of information pertaining to the patient's history as well as current state and well-being. In this study, we explore the structure of these problem list entries both grammatically and semantically in an attempt to learn the specialized rules, or "sublanguage" that governs them. Our methods focus on a large-scale corpus analysis of problem list entries. Using Resource Description Framework (RDF), we incorporate inferencing and reasoning via domain-specific ontologies into our analysis to elicit common semantic patterns. We also explore how these methods can be applied dynamically to learn specific sublanguage features of interest for a particular concept or topic within the domain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30815190PMC6371258What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.