ArticleAMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium2018
Trust and Sharing in an Interprofessional Environment: A Thematic Analysis From Child Development Support Work in the Community.
Article in AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Factors influencing mutual trust in interprofessional partnerships within primary care settings: a systematic review.Family practice · 2026Pooled it
- Sensing everyday activity: Parent perceptions and feasibility.Infant behavior & development · 2021Article
- Why Should I Trust You? Supporting the Sharing of Health Data in the Interprofessional Space of Child Development.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2020Article
- Connected Personas: Translating the Complexity of Older Adult Personal Health Information Management for Designers of Health Information Technologies.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Health information technology (HIT) could aid collaboration in the complex, interprofessional space of child development. Trust between stakeholders is necessary to support collaboration, but extant research provides little guidance on designing HIT that promotes trust within interprofessional collaborations. We analyzed interview data obtained from a heterogeneous group of stakeholders (n = 46) including parents and various service providers to explore trust relationships in the child development space. Our thematic analysis revealed that stakeholders assess the trustworthiness of others based on perceived competence, benevolence, integrity, relevance to work, and source of the data. Stakeholders also based trust on the type of data shared, electronic system features or functions, perceived risks and benefits of sharing information, and made trust calculations based on multiple factors. Our research identifies multiple aspects of trust that should be considered in designs for collaborative HIT systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30815186PMC6371242What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.