Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30815184›Full record

ArticleAMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium2018

Using Neural Multi-task Learning to Extract Substance Abuse Information from Clinical Notes.

Kevin Lybarger, Meliha Yetisgen, Mari Ostendorf

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Machine learning approaches for electronic health records phenotyping: a methodical review.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2023
    Article
  3. MIMIC-SBDH: A Dataset for Social and Behavioral Determinants of Health.Proceedings of machine learning research · 2021
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kevin LybargerUniversity of Washington, Seattle, WA.
Meliha YetisgenUniversity of Washington, Seattle, WA.
Mari OstendorfUniversity of Washington, Seattle, WA.
University of Washington · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Substance abuse carries many negative health consequences. Detailed information about patients' substance abuse history is usually captured in free-text clinical notes. Automatic extraction of substance abuse information is vital to assess patients' risk for developing certain diseases and adverse outcomes. We introduce a novel neural architecture to automatically extract substance abuse information. The model, which uses multi-task learning, outperformed previous work and several baselines created using discrete models. The classifier obtained 0.88-0.95 F1 for detecting substance abuse status (current, none, past, unknown) on a withheld test set. Other substance abuse entities (amount, frequency, exposure history, quit history, and type) were also extracted with high-performance. Our results demonstrate the feasibility of extracting substance abuse information with little annotated data. Additionally, we used the neural multi-task model to automatically annotate 59.7K notes from a different source. Manual review of a subset of these notes resulted 0.84-0.89 precision for substance abuse status.

Indexed as

Electronic Health RecordsMachine LearningNeural Networks, ComputerAlgorithmsFemaleHumansInformation Storage and RetrievalMaleSubstance Abuse DetectionSubstance-Related Disorders

Identifiers

PMID30815184
PMCPMC6371261
OpenAlexW2941102086

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.