Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30815179›Full record

ArticleAMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium2018

DrKnow: A Diagnostic Learning Tool with Feedback from Automated Clinical Decision Support.

Piyapong Khumrin, Anna Ryan, Terry Juddy, Karin Verspoor

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Piyapong KhumrinSchool of Computing and Information Systems, Melbourne School of Engineering, University of Melbourne, Australia.
Anna RyanDepartment of Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Australia.
Terry JuddyDepartment of Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Australia.
Karin VerspoorSchool of Computing and Information Systems, Melbourne School of Engineering, University of Melbourne, Australia.
University of Melbourne · AUChiang Mai University · TH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Providing medical trainees with effective feedback is critical to the successful development of their diagnostic reasoning skills. We present the design of DrKnow, a web-based learning application that utilises a clinical decision support system (CDSS) and virtual cases to support the development of problem-solving and decision-making skills in medical students. Based on the clinical information they request and prioritise, DrKnow provides personalised feedback to help students develop differential and provisional diagnoses at key decision points as they work through the virtual cases. Once students make a final diagnosis, DrKnow presents students with information about their overall diagnostic performance as well as recommendations for diagnosing similar cases. This paper argues that designing DrKnow around a task-sensitive CDSS provides a suitable approach enabling positive student learning outcomes, while simultaneously overcoming the resource challenges of expert clinician-supported bedside teaching.

Indexed as

Abdominal PainComputer-Assisted InstructionDecision Support Systems, ClinicalDiagnosis, DifferentialFeedbackMachine LearningEducation, Medical, UndergraduateHumansInternetSimulation TrainingStudents, MedicalTeaching

Identifiers

PMID30815179
PMCPMC6371235
OpenAlexW2941405514

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.