ArticleAMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium2018
Exploring the Design of an Inpatient Peer Support Tool: Views of Adult Patients.
Article in AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Use and impact of an online community for hospital patients.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2020Article
- Informatics opportunities to involve patients in hospital safety: a conceptual model.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2020Article
- Avoir sa santé en main : le sentiment d'habilitation tel que perçu par les jeunes adultes souffrant d'un cancer avancé.Canadian oncology nursing journal = Revue canadienne de nursing oncologique · 2020Article
- Taking control over our health: Empowerment as perceived by young adults living with advanced cancer.Canadian oncology nursing journal = Revue canadienne de nursing oncologique · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Despite wide recognition of the value, expertise, and support that patient-peers provide in a variety of health contexts, mechanisms to design and enable peer support in the inpatient setting have not been sufficiently explored. To better understand the opportunities for an inpatient peer support tool, we surveyed 100 adult patients and caregivers, and conducted follow-up, semi-structured interviews with 15 adult patients. In this paper, we describe five key peer support needs that our adult patient participants expressed: (1) adjusting to the hospital environment, (2) understanding and normalizing medical care, (3) communicating with providers, (4) reporting and preventing medical errors, and (5) empowering peers. In addition, we identify privacy concerns, situational impairments, and communication mode as barriers to, and preferences for, interacting with peers. Based on our findings, we discuss intelligent peer matching and aggregating peer data as design recommendations for future inpatient peer support tools.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30815170PMC6371245W2941481391What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.