Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30815116›Full record

ArticleAMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium2018

Scalable Electronic Phenotyping For Studying Patient Comorbidities.

Albee Y Ling, Emily Alsentzer, Josephine Chen, Juan M Banda, Suzanne Tamang, Evan Minty

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Albee Y LingBiomedical Informatics Training Program, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
Emily AlsentzerBiomedical Informatics Training Program, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
Josephine ChenBiomedical Informatics Training Program, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
Juan M BandaStanford Center for Biomedical Informatics Research, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
Suzanne TamangDepartment of Biomedical Data Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
Evan MintyBiomedical Informatics Training Program, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over 75 million Americans have multiple concurrent chronic conditions and medical decision making for these patients is mostly based on retrospective cohort studies. Current methods to generate cohorts of patients with comorbidities are neither scalable nor generalizable. We propose a supervised machine learning algorithm for learning comorbidity phenotypes without requiring manually created training sets. First, we generated myocardial infarction (MI) and type-2 diabetes (T2DM) patient cohorts using ICD9-based imperfectly labeled samples upon which LASSO logistic regression models were trained. Second, we assessed the effects of training sample size, inclusion of physician input, and inclusion of clinical text features on model performance. Using ICD9 codes as our labeling heuristic, we achieved comparable performance to models created using keywords as labeling heuristic. We found that expert input and higher training sample sizes could compensate for the lack of clinical text derived features. However, our best performing model included clinical text as features with a large training sample size.

Indexed as

ComorbidityDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Myocardial InfarctionSupervised Machine LearningChronic DiseaseHumansInternational Classification of DiseasesLogistic ModelsRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID30815116
PMCPMC6371288

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.