Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30815114›Full record

ArticleAMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium2018

Investigating a Needle-Based Epidural Procedure in Obstetric Anesthesia.

Eva K Lee, Haozheng Tian, Jinha Lee, Xin Wie, John Neeld, K Doug Smith, Alan R Kaplan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Eva K LeeNSF-Whitaker Center for Operations Research in Medicine and HealthCare.
Haozheng TianNSF-Whitaker Center for Operations Research in Medicine and HealthCare.
Jinha LeeNSF-Whitaker Center for Operations Research in Medicine and HealthCare.
Xin WieNSF-Whitaker Center for Operations Research in Medicine and HealthCare.
John NeeldNorthside Hospital Department of Anesthesia, Atlanta, GA.
K Doug SmithNorthside Hospital Department of Anesthesia, Atlanta, GA.
Alan R KaplanNorthside Hospital Department of Anesthesia, Atlanta, GA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study investigates the safety and efficacy of a large-dose, needle-based epidural technique in obstetric anesthesia. The technique differs from a standard, catheter-based approach in that the anesthetic dose is administered through an epidural needle prior to insertion of the epidural catheter. Using a data-driven informatics and machine learning approach, our findings show that the needle-based technique is faster and more dose-effective in achieving sensory level. We also find that injecting large doses in the epidural space through the epidural needle is safe, with complication rates similar to those reported in published literature for catheter-based technique. Further, machine learning reveals that if the needle dose is kept under 18 ml, the resulting hypotension rate will be significantly lower than published results. The machine learning framework can predict the incidence of hypotension with 85% accuracy. The findings from this investigation facilitate delivery improvement and establish an improved clinical practice guideline for training and for dissemination of safe practice.

Indexed as

Machine LearningAnalgesia, ObstetricalAnesthesia, EpiduralAnesthesia, ObstetricalAnesthetics, LocalFemaleHumansHypotensionNeedlesPregnancyTask Performance and AnalysisWorkflowAnesthetics, Local

Identifiers

PMID30815114
PMCPMC6371386

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.