Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30815109›Full record

ArticleAMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium2018

Using Machine Learning to Predict the Information Seeking Behavior of Clinicians Using an Electronic Medical Record System.

Andrew J King, Gregory F Cooper, Harry Hochheiser, Gilles Clermont, Milos Hauskrecht, Shyam Visweswaran

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Physician Usage and Acceptance of a Machine Learning Recommender System for Simulated Clinical Order Entry.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Andrew J KingUniversity of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Gregory F CooperUniversity of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Harry HochheiserUniversity of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Gilles ClermontUniversity of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Milos HauskrechtUniversity of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Shyam VisweswaranUniversity of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.

Funding

The internship in Biomedical Research, Informatics, and Computer Science (iBRIC): Biomedical Informatics and Data Science research experiences for students from Minority Serving InstitutionsT15LM007059 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI HARRY S HOCHHEISER · 1987 to 2026
$23.9M
Real-time detection of deviations in clinical care in ICU data streamsR01GM088224 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI CLERMONT, GILLES, COOPER, GREGORY F. · 2009 to 2017
$3.7M
Development and Evaluation of a Learning Electronic Medical Record SystemR01LM012095 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI VISWESWARAN, SHYAM · 2015 to 2018
$1.8M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM088224NLM NIH HHS R01 LM012095NLM NIH HHS T15 LM007059
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Poor electronic medical record (EMR) usability is detrimental to both clinicians and patients. A better EMR would provide concise, context sensitive patient data, but doing so entails the difficult task of knowing which data are relevant. To determine the relevance of patient data in different contexts, we collect and model the information seeking behavior of clinicians using a learning EMR (LEMR) system. Sufficient data were collected to train predictive models for 80 different targets (e.g., glucose level, heparin administration) and 27 of them had AUROC values of greater than 0.7. These results are encouraging considering the high variation in information seeking behavior (intraclass correlation 0.40). We plan to apply these models to a new set of patient cases and adapt the LEMR interface to highlight relevant patient data, and thus provide concise, context sensitive data.

Indexed as

Information Seeking BehaviorMachine LearningMedical Records Systems, ComputerizedUser-Computer InterfaceAcute Kidney InjuryDiagnostic Tests, RoutineElectronic Health RecordsHumansIntensive Care UnitsPhysiciansRespiratory Insufficiency

Identifiers

PMID30815109
PMCPMC6371238

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.