ArticleAMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium2018
Clinical Documentation in Electronic Health Record Systems: Analysis of Patient Record Review During Outpatient Ophthalmology Visits.
Article in AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Electronic health record note review in an outpatient specialty clinic: who is looking?JAMIA open · 2021Article
- Electronic Health Record Use among Ophthalmology Residents while on Call.Journal of academic ophthalmology (2017) · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Busy clinicians struggle with productivity and usability in electronic health record systems (EHRs). While previous studies have investigated documentation practices and strategies in the inpatient setting, outpatient documentation and review practices by clinicians using EHRs are relatively unknown. In this study, we look at clinicians' patterns of note review in the EHR during outpatient follow-up office visits in ophthalmology. Key findings from this study are that the number and percentage of notes reviewed is very low, there is variation between providers, specialties, and users, and staff access more notes than physicians. These findings suggest that the vast majority of content in the EHR is not being used by clinicians; improved EHR designs would better present this data and support the information needs of outpatient clinicians.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30815099PMC6371368What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.