Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30815089›Full record

ArticleAMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium2018

Analysis of Total Time Requirements of Electronic Health Record Use by Ophthalmologists Using Secondary EHR Data.

Isaac H Goldstein, Michelle R Hribar, Leah G Reznick, Michael F Chiang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Learning Tasks of Pediatric Providers from Electronic Health Record Audit Logs.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Isaac H GoldsteinMedical Informatics & Clinical Epidemiology.
Michelle R HribarMedical Informatics & Clinical Epidemiology.
Leah G ReznickOphthalmology Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR.
Michael F ChiangMedical Informatics & Clinical Epidemiology.

Funding

TRAINING PROGRAM IN HEALTH INFORMATICST15LM007088 · NLM · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI WILLIAM R HERSH, Vishnu Mohan · 1992 to 2026
$23.4M
Proteomics CoreP30EY010572 · NEI · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI Kate E Keller · 1995 to 2026
$19.4M
Modeling and Optimization of Clinical Processes Using EHR DataR00LM012238 · NLM · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI HRIBAR, MICHELLE · 2017 to 2019
$672k
Modeling and Optimization of Clinical Processes Using EHR DataK99LM012238 · NLM · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI HRIBAR, MICHELLE · 2015 to 2016
$178k
NEI NIH HHS P30 EY010572NLM NIH HHS K99 LM012238NLM NIH HHS R00 LM012238NLM NIH HHS T15 LM007088
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electronic Health Records (EHRs) are widely used in the United States for clinical care and billing activities. Their widespread adoption has raised a variety of concerns about their effects on providers and medical care. As researchers address these concerns, they will need to understand how much time providers actually spend on the EHR. This study develops and validates methods for calculating total time requirements for EHR use by ophthalmologists using secondary EHR data from audit logs. Key findings from this study are that (1) Secondary EHR data can be used to estimate lower bounds on provider EHR use, (2) Providers spend a large amount of time using the EHR, (3) Most time spent on the EHR is spent reviewing information. These findings have important implications for practicing clinicians, and for EHR system design in the future.

Indexed as

Electronic Health RecordsOphthalmologistsTime and Motion StudiesAcademic Medical CentersAdultEfficiency, OrganizationalFaculty, MedicalFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOregonTime FactorsUnited States

Identifiers

PMID30815089
PMCPMC6371357

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.