Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30815079›Full record

ArticleAMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium2018

Using Feedback Intervention Theory to Guide Clinical Dashboard Design.

Dawn Dowding, Jacqueline Merrill, David Russell

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Community engagement in the development of health-related data visualizations: a scoping review.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Requirements for a quality dashboard: Lessons from National Clinical Audits.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Dawn DowdingThe University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Jacqueline MerrillColumbia University School of Nursing, New York, NY.
David RussellAppalachian State University, Boone, NC.
Appalachian State University · USColumbia University · USUniversity of Manchester · GB

Funding

Development of Dashboards to Provide Feedback to Home Care NursesR21HS023855 · AHRQ · VISITING NURSE SERVICE OF NEW YORK · PI DOWDING, DAWN · 2015 to 2015
$300k
AHRQ HHS R21 HS023855
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The provision of feedback to clinicians and organizations on the quality of care they provide is thought to influence clinician and organizational behavior leading to care improvements. Clinical Dashboards use data visualization techniques to provide feedback to individuals on their performance compared to quality metrics. In this paper we outline a theoretical approach to the design of a clinical dashboard; Feedback Intervention Theory (FIT). Priorities for feedback were identified using focus groups with home care nurses (n=61). Individual variation in graph literacy and numeracy among nurses and their ability to comprehend visualized data displays were evaluated using an online survey. The results from the focus group and survey were used to inform a prototype dashboard which was evaluated for usability with a separate sample of home care nurses. FIT provided a theoretical base for the dashboard design to ensure feedback that should positively impact clinician behavior.

Indexed as

Data DisplayElectronic Health RecordsFeedbackHome Health NursingComprehensionFocus GroupsHumansSurveys and QuestionnairesUser-Computer InterfaceWorkflow

Identifiers

PMID30815079
PMCPMC6371234
OpenAlexW2941757827

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.