Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30815071›Full record

ArticleAMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium2018

An Exploration of the Terminology of Clinical Cognition and Reasoning.

James J Cimino, Ziran Li, Chunhua Weng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Formal representation of patients' care context data: the path to improving the electronic health record.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2020
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Putting the "why" in "EHR": capturing and coding clinical cognition.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2019
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

James J CiminoInformatics Institute, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama.
Ziran LiDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University, New York, New York.
Chunhua WengDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University, New York, New York.

Funding

Bridging the Semantic Gap Between Research Eligibility Criteria and Clinical DataR01LM009886 · NLM · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI WENG, CHUNHUA · 2009 to 2020
$5.3M
UAB Center for Clinical and Translational Sciences (CCTS)TL1TR001418 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI SAAG, KENNETH G · 2015 to 2018
$2.1M
NCATS NIH HHS TL1 TR001418NLM NIH HHS R01 LM009886
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We hypothesize that the functionality of electronic health records could be improved with the addition of formal representations of clinicians' cognitive processes, including such things as the interpretation and synthesis of patient findings and the rational for diagnostic and therapeutic decisions. We carried out a four-phase analysis of clinical case studies to characterize how such processes are represented through relationships between clinical terms. The result is an terminology of 26 relationships that were validated against published clinical cases with 85.4% interrater reliability. We believe that capturing patient-specific information with these relationships can lead to improvements in clinical decision support systems, information retrieval and learning health systems.

Indexed as

CognitionElectronic Health RecordsTerminology as TopicUser-Computer InterfaceDecision MakingDecision Support Systems, ClinicalHumansReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID30815071
PMCPMC6371388

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.