Trial reportAMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium2018
OneNote Meal: A Photo-Based Diary Study for Reflective Meal Tracking.
Trial report in AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A randomized safety and feasibility crossover trial of two Mediterranean-ketogenic interventions in individuals with Parkinson's disease.Journal of Parkinson's disease · 2026Trial
- Opportunities to design better computer vison-assisted food diaries to support individuals and experts in dietary assessment: An observation and interview study with nutrition experts.PLOS digital health · 2024Article
- It's About the Journey - Capturing Stories of the Fluctuating Experiences of Youth Kidney Transplant Patients.Proceedings of the ACM on human-computer interaction · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
When a self-monitoring tool is used to enhance behavior awareness, the tool should afford reflection by design. This work examines the "valence of meal" (i.e., healthy versus unhealthy meal) as a means to support reflection on a person's diet in photo-based meal tracking. To study the effect of imposing valence on meal tracking, we designed two conditions-one focusing on capturing healthy meals, the other capturing unhealthy meals-and conducted a between-subjects diary study with 22 college students over four weeks. According to their group assignment, participants tracked only healthy or unhealthy meals by taking photos and rationalizing in texts why their meals were particularly healthy or unhealthy. We found that participants in both groups became more aware of their diet, but the valence of meal influenced them differently regarding their meal assessment, self-reflection, and food choice intention. We discuss ways to leverage valence in designing reflective meal tracking systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30815063PMC6371351What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.