Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30815052›Full record

ArticleAMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium2018

Ascertaining Depression Severity by Extracting Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) Scores from Clinical Notes.

Prakash Adekkanattu, Evan T Sholle, Joseph DeFerio, Jyotishman Pathak, Stephen B Johnson, Thomas R Campion

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Medicaid Expansion and Veterans' Reliance on the VA for Depression Care.Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Prakash AdekkanattuInformation Technologies and Services Department, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY.
Evan T SholleInformation Technologies and Services Department, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY.
Joseph DeFerioDepartment of Healthcare Policy and Research, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY.
Jyotishman PathakDepartment of Healthcare Policy and Research, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY.
Stephen B JohnsonDepartment of Healthcare Policy and Research, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY.
Thomas R CampionInformation Technologies and Services Department, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY.

Funding

Disparities in COVID Disease Severity and Outcomes in New York CityUL1TR002384 · NCATS · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI JULIANNE L IMPERATO-MCGINLEY · 2017 to 2026
$86.2M
Clinical and Translational Science CenterUL1TR000457 · NCATS · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI IMPERATO-MCGINLEY, JULIANNE L · 2012 to 2016
$46.0M
National Infrastructure for Standardized and Portable EHR Phenotyping AlgorithmsR01GM105688 · NIGMS · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI LUO, YUAN, PATHAK, JYOTISHMAN · 2013 to 2020
$5.7M
Modeling Social Behavior for Healthcare Utilization in DepressionR01MH105384 · NIMH · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI PATHAK, JYOTISHMAN, SHETH, AMIT P · 2015 to 2018
$2.1M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000457NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002384NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM105688NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH105384
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) is a validated instrument for assessing depression severity. While some electronic health record (EHR) systems capture PHQ-9 scores in a structured format, unstructured clinical notes remain the only source in many settings, which presents data retrieval challenges for research and clinical decision support. To address this gap, we extended the open-source Leo natural language processing (NLP) platform to extract PHQ-9 scores from clinical notes and evaluated performance using EHR data for n=123,703 patients who were prescribed antidepressants. Compared to a reference standard, the NLP method exhibited high accuracy (97%), sensitivity (98%), precision (97%), and F-score (97%). Furthermore, of patients with PHQ-9 scores identified by the NLP method, 31% (n=498) had at least one PHQ-9 score clinically indicative of major depressive disorder (MDD), but lacked a structured ICD-9/10 diagnosis code for MDD. This NLP technique may facilitate accurate identification and stratification of patients with depression.

Indexed as

Electronic Health RecordsNatural Language ProcessingPatient Health QuestionnaireAdultDepressive DisorderHumansInformation Storage and RetrievalSeverity of Illness Index

Identifiers

PMID30815052
PMCPMC6371338

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.