Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30815037›Full record

ArticleGut pathogens2019

The influence of probiotic bacteria and human gut microorganisms causing opportunistic infections on

M Lepczyńska, E Dzika

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gut pathogens, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Antiprotozoal Effects ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  6. The Role ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  7. ISME communications · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Microorganisms · 2024
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Frontiers in microbiology · 2021
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

M LepczyńskaDepartment of Medical Biology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Collegium Medicum, University of Warmia and Mazury, Żołnierska 14C, 10-561 Olsztyn, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-5289-6975
E DzikaDepartment of Medical Biology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Collegium Medicum, University of Warmia and Mazury, Żołnierska 14C, 10-561 Olsztyn, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-4319-5026
University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background

resultsBoth experiments, with xenic and axenic cultures, showed

conclusionsThis study has shown the potential of using

Indexed as

BlastocystisEradicationGut microbiotaProbioticsSubtype 3

Identifiers

PMID30815037
PMCPMC6376780
OpenAlexW2921811331

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.