Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30815028›Full record

SynthesisWorld journal of emergency surgery : WJES

Pre-hospital plasma in haemorrhagic shock management: current opinion and meta-analysis of randomized trials.

Federico Coccolini, Giacinto Pizzilli, Davide Corbella, Massimo Sartelli, Vanni Agnoletti, Vanessa Agostini, Gian Luca Baiocchi, Luca Ansaloni, Fausto Catena

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in World journal of emergency surgery : WJES. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Prehospital plasma transfusion versus standard of care following traumatic injury: a review of the systematic reviews and a meta-analysis.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Pre-hospital freeze-dried plasma for critical bleeding after trauma: A pilot randomized controlled trial.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2023
    Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Federico Coccolini1General, Emergency and Trauma Surgery, Bufalini Hospital, Viale Ghirotti 268, 47521 Cesena, Italy.
Giacinto Pizzilli2ICU department, Bufalini Hospital, Cesena, Italy.
Davide Corbella3ICU department, Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital, Bergamo, Italy.
Massimo SartelliGeneral Surgery department, Macerata Hospital, Macerata, Italy.
Vanni Agnoletti2ICU department, Bufalini Hospital, Cesena, Italy.
Vanessa Agostini5Transfusional and Immunohaematological disorders department, Bufalini hospital, Cesena, Italy.
Gian Luca Baiocchi6Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.
Luca Ansaloni1General, Emergency and Trauma Surgery, Bufalini Hospital, Viale Ghirotti 268, 47521 Cesena, Italy.
Fausto Catena7Emergency surgery department, Parma University Hospital, Parma, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTrauma-induced coagulopathy is one of the most difficult issues to manage in severely injured patients. The plasma efficacy in treating haemorrhagic-shocked patients is well known. The debated issue is the timing at which it should be administered. Few evidences exist regarding the effects on mortality consequent to the use of plasma alone given in pre-hospital setting. Recently, two randomized trials reported interesting and discordant results. The present paper aims to analyse data from those two randomized trials in order to obtain more univocal results.

methodsA systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of pre-hospital plasma vs. usual care in patients with haemorrhagic shock.

resultsTwo high-quality RCTs have been included with 626 patients (295 in plasma and 331 in usual care arm). Twenty-four-hour mortality seems to be reduced in pre-hospital plasma group (RR = 0.69; 95% CI = 0.48-0.99). Pre-hospital plasma has no significant effect on 1-month mortality (RR = 0.86; 95% CI = 0.68-1.11) as on acute lung injury and on multi-organ failure rates (OR = 1.03; 95% CI = 0.71-1.50, and OR = 1.30; 95% CI = 0.92-1.86, respectively).

conclusionsPre-hospital plasma infusion seems to reduce 24-h mortality in haemorrhagic shock patients. It does not seem to influence 1-month mortality, acute lung injury and multi-organ failure rates.

Indexed as

PlasmaEmergency Medical ServicesHumansMortalityRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicShock, HemorrhagicHaemorrhagicManagementMeta-analysisPre-hospitalShockTraumaTreatment

Identifiers

PMID30815028
PMCPMC6377767

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.