ArticleFrontiers in psychology2019
Publishing Research With Undergraduate Students via Replication Work: The Collaborative Replications and Education Project.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Data from CREP Replication of Does Money Buy Happiness, Diener et al. (2010).Journal of open psychology data · 2026Article
- Research methodology education in Europe: a multi-country, cross-disciplinary survey of current practices and perspectives.Research integrity and peer review · 2025Article
- International initiatives to enhance awareness and uptake of open research in psychology: a systematic mapping review.Royal Society open science · 2025Review
- The landscape of open science in behavioral addiction research: Current practices and future directions.Journal of behavioral addictions · 2023Review
- Eleven years of student replication projects provide evidence on the correlates of replicability in psychology.Royal Society open science · 2023Article
- The replication crisis has led to positive structural, procedural, and community changes.Communications psychology · 2023Review
- Spread the Word: Enhancing Replicability of Speech Research Through Stimulus Sharing.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2023Article
- Teaching open and reproducible scholarship: a critical review of the evidence base for current pedagogical methods and their outcomes.Royal Society open science · 2023Review
- Systematic reviewers' perspectives on replication of systematic reviews: A survey.Cochrane evidence synthesis and methods · 2023Article
- Towards a culture of open scholarship: the role of pedagogical communities.BMC research notes · 2022Article
- Cross-sectional validation of the PROMIS-Preference scoring system by its association with social determinants of health.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2021Article
- Research practices and statistical reporting quality in 250 economic psychology master's theses: a meta-research investigation.Royal Society open science · 2019Article
- Guiding Undergraduates Through the Process of First Authorship.Frontiers in psychology · 2019Article
- Scholarship of Discovery and Beyond: Thinking About Multiple Forms of Scholarship and Elements of Project-Based Learning to Engage Undergraduates in Publishable Research.Frontiers in psychology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.