Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30814962›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2019

Psychoeducational Intervention for Perinatal Depression: Study Protocol of a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Luca Steardo, Vito Caivano, Gaia Sampogna, Arcangelo Di Cerbo, Giovanna Fico, Francesca Zinno, Valeria Del Vecchio, Vincenzo Giallonardo, Marco Torella, Mario Luciano and 1 more

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Body mass index on perinatal depression: A critical viewpoint.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2023
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Community Mental Health Services in Italy.Consortium psychiatricum · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Luca SteardoDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy.
Vito CaivanoDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy.
Gaia SampognaDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy.
Arcangelo Di CerboDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy.
Giovanna FicoDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy.
Francesca ZinnoDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy.
Valeria Del VecchioDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy.
Vincenzo GiallonardoDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy.
Marco TorellaDepartment of Gynecology, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy.
Mario LucianoDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy.
Andrea FiorilloDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Perinatal depression (PD) is a severe and disabling condition impacting negatively on children in terms of adverse neonatal outcomes and on the well-being of women and their families. All pregnant women attending the unit of Gynecology and Obstetrics Service of the University of Campania "L. Vanvitelli" will be screened for PD using the Edinburgh Postpartum Depression Scale (EPDS). Women with a score ≥10 at the EPDS will be invited to receive a full psychiatric assessment. The required sample size is of 126 women with PD which will be randomly allocated to either an experimental group, receiving a uni-familiar psychoeducational intervention, or to a control group, receiving the Best Treatment Option (BTO). Patients will be evaluated through several assessment instruments: Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D), Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A), Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF), Clinical Global Impression (CGI), Manchester Short Assessment of Quality of Life (MANSA), Family Assessment Device (FAD), Family Coping Questionnaire (FCQ), and Pattern of Care Schedule (PCS). Patients will be evaluated at baseline, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months post-randomization. The severity of depressive symptoms at the HAM-D scale has been selected as primary outcome. Other outcome measures include improvement in the severity of anxiety symptoms, of global and personal functioning, an improvement in family members' coping strategies and in the level of quality of life. It has been highlighted the importance of developing screening and treating programs for PD, and our study will use rigorous study design to evaluate the efficacy of the adaption of a well-known family psychoeducational model to the treatment of PD. The aims of present trial are to: (1) develop an informative package for pregnant women with PD; (2) promote a screening programme for PD; (3) identify those (socio-demographic and pregnancy-related environmental) factors associated with a higher risk to develop a perinatal or postnatal depression; (4) evaluate the efficacy of a new experimental psychoeducational intervention in reducing the depressive symptoms during pregnancy compared to the BTO.

Indexed as

coping strategiesfamily burdenperinatal depressionsevere mental disorderswomen mental health

Identifiers

PMID30814962
PMCPMC6381058

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.