Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30814941›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2019

Neural Connectivity in Syntactic Movement Processing.

Eduardo Europa, Darren R Gitelman, Swathi Kiran, Cynthia K Thompson

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01927302 (The Center for the Neurobiology of Language Recovery), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01927302 nacompletednot on this map

The Center for the Neurobiology of Language Recovery (CNLR)

TypeinterventionalSponsorNorthwestern UniversityRan2013 to 2019Enrolled90ConditionsAphasia, Dysgraphia, Anomia, AgrammatismArmsTreatment Focusing on Naming Objects, Treatment Focusing on Improving Spelling Abilities, Treatment Focusing on Improving Sentence Processing, No Treatment
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Neurocognitive Recovery of Sentence Processing in Aphasia.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2019
    Review
  11. Recovery of offline and online sentence processing in aphasia: Language and domain-general network neuroplasticity.Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Eduardo EuropaRoxelyn and Richard Pepper Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, United States.
Darren R GitelmanAdvocate Lutheran General Hospital, Park Ridge, IL, United States.
Swathi KiranCollege of Health & Rehabilitation Sciences, Boston University, Boston, MA, United States.
Cynthia K ThompsonRoxelyn and Richard Pepper Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, United States.

Funding

Neurobiology of Language Recovery in Aphasia: Natural History and Treatment-Ind*P50DC012283 · NIDCD · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY · PI THOMPSON, CYNTHIA K · 2013 to 2017
$11.7M
NIDCD NIH HHS P50 DC012283
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Linguistic theory suggests non-canonical sentences subvert the dominant

Indexed as

dynamic causal modelingfunctional magnetic resonance imagingnon-canonical sentencessentence comprehensionsyntactic movement

Identifiers

PMID30814941
PMCPMC6381040

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.