ReviewReproductive medicine and biology2019
Clinical strategies for ART treatment of infertile women with advanced maternal age.
Review in Reproductive medicine and biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pretreatment prediction for IVF outcomes: generalized applicable model or centre-specific model?Human reproduction (Oxford, England) · 2024Article
- Recent Status of Pregnancies at an Advanced Maternal Age at a Japanese Perinatal Center.Cureus · 2023Article
- Reporting on the Role of miRNAs and Affected Pathways on the Molecular Backbone of Ovarian Insufficiency: A Systematic Review and Critical Analysis Mapping of Future Research.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2020Article
- Clinical strategies for ART treatment of infertile women with advanced maternal age.Reproductive medicine and biology · 2019Review
- Clinical relevance of a newly developed endometrial receptivity test for patients with recurrent implantation failure in Japan.Reproductive medicine and biologyArticle
- EnhancingGynecology and minimally invasive therapyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAn ever-increasing number of women in our country with advanced maternal age are choosing to achieve pregnancy. This means effective strategies are needed for infertile patients. Questions arise, however, concerning the need for ovarian stimulation, and, if so, whether intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) is better than conventional insemination for those women who may have only one mature oocyte.
methodsWe evaluated our data to answer these questions. Herein, we also introduce our strategy for patients who show unsynchronized follicular growth. MAIN
findingsOvarian stimulation in ART treatment for patients with advanced maternal age has resulted in the achievement of higher pregnancy rates, and therefore, this form of stimulation is often selected. Based on our data, ICSI as an insemination procedure has not improved clinical pregnancy rates compared with conventional insemination and has actually decreased the clinical pregnancy rates.
conclusionIn this article, we reviewed and compared the protocols and strategies that are available to increase the number of developed embryos for the patients with advanced maternal age. We hope that this review will be helpful for both patients and clinicians.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.