Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30814680›Full record

ArticleProstate cancer and prostatic diseases2019

Prediction of extraprostatic extension by MRI tumor contact length: difference between anterior and posterior prostate cancer.

Kazuhiro Matsumoto, Hirotaka Akita, Keiichi Narita, Akinori Hashiguchi, Kimiharu Takamatsu, Toshikazu Takeda, Takeo Kosaka, Ryuichi Mizuno, Eiji Kikuchi, Mototsugu Oya and 1 more

Abstract readEvaluation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Combining the Tumor Contact Length and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Better Predicts Extraprostatic Extension of Prostate Cancer with Capsular Abutment: A 3 Tesla MR Imaging Study.Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kazuhiro MatsumotoDepartment of Urology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan. kazz_matsumoto@yahoo.co.jp.
Hirotaka AkitaDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Keiichi NaritaDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Akinori HashiguchiDepartment of Pathology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Kimiharu TakamatsuDepartment of Urology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Toshikazu TakedaDepartment of Urology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Takeo KosakaDepartment of Urology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4371-4594
Ryuichi MizunoDepartment of Urology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Eiji KikuchiDepartment of Urology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Mototsugu OyaDepartment of Urology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Masahiro JinzakiDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Keio University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTumor contact length (TCL) is defined as the extent of contact between prostate cancer and the prostatic capsule, and its predictive value for microscopic extraprostatic extension (EPE) has been reported. However, the impact of the zonal origin (anterior or posterior tumor) of the tumor on the diagnosis of EPE is controversial.

methodsWe retrospectively analyzed the records of 233 consecutive patients who underwent preoperative MRI and radical prostatectomy. We designated their tumors as anterior or posterior, and evaluated the correlation between the TCL measured by MRI and microscopic EPE in the radical prostatectomy specimen. Then, we created the predicted probability curves for EPE versus TCL for anterior and posterior prostate cancer.

resultsThere were 109 patients (47%) with an anterior tumor and 124 patients (53%) with a posterior tumor. Postoperative pathological analysis confirmed pT3 in 18 patients (17%) with an anterior tumor and in 53 patients (43%) with a posterior tumor. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that the zonal origin of the tumor was an independent predictive factor for EPE. We developed separate probability curves of EPE versus TCL for anterior and posterior prostate cancer, which revealed that anterior tumors were less likely to invade the extraprostatic tissues. Among patients whose TCL was 10-20 mm, 9/32 patients (28%) with an anterior tumor had EPE compared with 24/45 patients (53%) with a posterior tumor (p = 0.036). The decision curve of this EPE predictive model had high clinical efficacy.

conclusionsOur results indicate that anterior tumors have more favorable pathological characteristics than posterior tumors with the same TCL measured by MRI. We constructed two separate predicted probability curves for EPE after discriminating anterior and posterior tumors, which will be useful for decision making in clinical practice.

Indexed as

Diffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingModels, BiologicalAgedHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm InvasivenessPreoperative PeriodProbabilityPrognosisProstateProstatectomyProstatic NeoplasmsRetrospective StudiesROC CurveTumor Burden

Identifiers

PMID30814680
OpenAlexW2916325197

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.