Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30814663›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Testing a Cognitive Control Model of Human Intelligence.

Yu Chen, Alfredo Spagna, Tingting Wu, Tae Hyeong Kim, Qiong Wu, Caiqi Chen, Yanhong Wu, Jin Fan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Multivariate Lesion-Behavior Mapping of General Cognitive Ability and Its Psychometric Constituents.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2020
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Yu ChenDepartment of Psychology, Queens College, The City University of New York, Queens, NY, USA.
Alfredo SpagnaDepartment of Psychology, Columbia University in the City of New York, New York, NY, USA.
Tingting WuDepartment of Psychology, Queens College, The City University of New York, Queens, NY, USA.
Tae Hyeong KimDepartment of Psychology, Queens College, The City University of New York, Queens, NY, USA.
Qiong WuSchool of Psychology, Capital Normal University, Beijing, China.
Caiqi ChenSchool of Psychology, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Yanhong WuSchool of Psychological and Cognitive Sciences, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Jin FanDepartment of Psychology, Queens College, The City University of New York, Queens, NY, USA. jin.fan@qc.cuny.edu.

Funding

Uncertainty, Cognitive Control, and the BrainR01MH094305 · NIMH · QUEENS COLLEGE · PI FAN, JIN · 2012 to 2016
$1.7M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH094305
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The definition of human intelligence and its underlying psychological constructs have long been debated. Although previous studies have investigated the fundamental cognitive functions determining intellectual abilities, such as the broadly defined executive functions including working memory, the core process has yet to be identified. A potential candidate for such a role might be cognitive control, a psychological construct for the coordination of thoughts and actions under conditions of uncertainty. In this study, we tested a cognitive control model of intellectual ability by examining the association between cognitive control, measured by a perceptual decision-making task and by the attention network test, and general intelligence including components of fluid intelligence (Gf, concerning the ability to solve problems by abstraction) and crystalized intelligence (Gc, related to learning from prior knowledge and experience) measured by the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale. We also examined the potential role of cognitive control as a core process involved in another determinant of intellectual abilities, the working memory, measured by the N-back tasks and the working memory complex span tasks. The relationship among intelligence, cognitive control, and working memory was examined using structural equation modeling. Results showed that cognitive control shared a large amount of variance with working memory and both measures were strongly associated with Gf and Gc, with a stronger association with Gf than Gc. These findings suggest that cognitive control, serving as a core construct of executive functions, contributes substantially to general intellectual ability, especially fluid intelligence.

Indexed as

Models, PsychologicalAttentionCognitionExecutive FunctionHumansIntelligenceIntelligence TestsMemory, Short-TermStudentsWechsler Scales

Identifiers

PMID30814663
PMCPMC6393508

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.